summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pactest/tests
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* New fileconflict005.py pactestNagy Gabor2008-07-29
| | | | | | | This makes the fileconflict004.py test complete. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: add test.expectfailure option for testsDan McGee2008-07-24
| | | | | | | | This will enable us to mark tests we know currently fail to differentiate them from those that we know should pass. Regressions should be easier to spot this way. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* New fileconflict004.py pactestNagy Gabor2008-07-22
| | | | | | Thread: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-July/012465.html Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
* sync_addtarget reworkNagy Gabor2008-07-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now '-S provision' handling is done in the back-end. In case of multiple providers, the first one is selected (behavior change: deleted provision002.py). The old processing order was: literal, group, provision; the new one: literal, provision, group. This is more rational, but "pacman -S group" will be slower now. "pacman -S repo/provision" also works. Provision was generalized to dependencies, so you can resolve deps by hand: "pacman -S 'bash>2.0'" or "pacman -S 'core/bash>2.0'" etc. This can be useful in makepkg dependency resolving. The changes were documented in pacman manual. alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers and _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers functions were removed, since they are no longer needed. I added some verbosity to "select provider instead of literal" and "fallback to group". Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* New remove060.py pactestNagy Gabor2008-07-13
| | | | | | | This is a group removal test. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Remove requiredby from pactestsNagy Gabor2008-07-07
| | | | | | | | Also remove some meaningless pactests (broken requiredby, requiredby*.py tests). requiredby001.py was renamed to upgrade076.py. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Resolvedeps reworkNagy Gabor2008-07-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I divided resolvedeps into 2 functions. The new _alpm_resolvedep function will resolve one dependency, for example the 'foo>=1.0-1' dependency. It can be useful in sync_addtarget refactoring. The resolvedeps parameters were changed, to be coherent with recursedeps: * the target-list is an alpm_list* instead of alpm_list**. This is OK, because alpm_list_add == alpm_list_add_last * syncpkg param was removed. list contains the to-be-installed packages, resolvedeps will add the required dependencies into this list * trans param was removed, it was used in QUESTION() only, which can be used on the main (handle->trans) transaction only (because the front-end cannot access our pseudo-transactions at all!). The patch fixes some wrong dynamic pmdepmissing_t usage. I did a behavior change (and sync1003.py was modified accordingly), which needs some explanation: The old resolvedeps didn't elect packages from 'remove' list. I've dropped this because I don't want that 2nd excluding list param. In fact, in real life, we ~never need this rule. Resolvedeps is called before checkconflicts, so only -Su's %REPLACES% packages are sitting in 'remove' list. This means, that we have the replacement packages in our target list. Usually "foo replaces bar" means, that bar isn't in our repos any more, so resolvedeps *cannot* elect it; but usually it won't try it at all, because foo is in the target list, and it is expected to satisfy 'bar>=1.0-1'-like dependencies too. Since checkdeps and checkconflicts is done after resolvedeps, this cannot cause any harm. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix versioncmp regression after updateDan McGee2008-05-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 84283672853350a84d2a71b72dc06e180cad1587 introduced the regression, and a previous commit introduced the vercmptest.sh test script to track down these issues. This commit solves the problem by removing the previous attempt at locating the pkgrel portions and replacing it with something that performs the correct logic. While tracking down everything I needed to, I also found a mistake in one of the pactests which is fixed here as well as increased the functionality and verbosity of the vercmptest script to both print out each test it is running as well as automatically run the mirror of each test case. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Pactests for sync operations with NoUpgrade and NoExtractAllan McRae2008-05-29
| | | | | | | | | | This adds the sync equivalents of upgrade010.py and upgrade070.py. Both additional test pass. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <mcrae_allan@hotmail.com> Acked-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Pactest for removing multiple items in a dependency chain.Allan McRae2008-05-29
| | | | | | | | | | | This adds a test for when removing multilpe packages recursively from a chain of dependent packages. This situation can occur when removing installed dependencies with makepkg if a "makedepend" recursively depends on a "depend" or if redundant dependancies are included. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <mcrae_allan at hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add SyncFirst option.Chantry Xavier2008-05-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch offers a way to fix FS#9228. By putting "SyncFirst = pacman" in pacman.conf, the version check will happen before the transaction really starts, and before any replacements is made. Otherwise, no version check is done. The sync301 pactest was updated to use this SyncFirst option. Example session with SyncFirst = pacman, and a newer pacman version available : $ pacman -Su (or pacman -S <any targets>) :: the following packages should be upgraded first : pacman :: Do you want to cancel the current operation :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets: pacman-x.y.z-t Total Download Size: x.xx MB Total Installed Size: x.xx MB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] n As Nagy previously noted, doing this check on any -S operations might look intrusive, but it can be required. For example, the case where you want to install a package with versioned provisions, using a pacman version which didn't support that feature yet (and there is already a newer pacman in sync db supporting it). Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Rework extract_single_file() temp file creationDan McGee2008-04-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We were a bit juryrigged using one call to mkstemp() before rather than extracting the new files side-by-side and doing our comparisons there. We were also facing some permissions issues. Instead, make our life easier by extracting all temp files to a '.paccheck' extension, doing our md5 comparisons, and then taking the correct actions. Still to be done here- a cleanup of the use of PATH_MAX which should not be necessary if we use dynamic allocation on the heap. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Update pactest to allow setting modes on created filesDan McGee2008-04-28
| | | | | | | | This should allow some future tests to set modes and ensure they are set after installation. It is also in anticipation of a test for checking permissions on pacnew files. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Update -Ss and -Qs pactests to include groupsDan McGee2008-03-30
| | | | | | | | This update causes query003 to fail before commit 4b8ada818e21aae43b4f54f146ffa215fdb9213e. Hopefully the issue doesn't crop up again but we might as well test for it. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Avoid duplicated target names.Nagy Gabor2008-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch should avoid duplicated target names in the backend. 1. sync_loadtarget will return with PM_ERR_TRANS_DUP_TARGET when trying to add a duplicated target 2. sysupgrade never pulls duplicated targets 3. resolvedeps won't pull duplicated targets anymore A pulled list was introduced in sync_prepare to improve the pmsyncpkg_t<->pmpkg_t list conversion by making it more direct. Also replace sync1005 and sync1006 by the sync1008 pactest, which is similar but more interesting (the provisions are dependencies instead of explicit targets). sync1005 didn't work as expected anyway. It was expecting that pacman failed, and pacman indeed failed, but not for the good reason. It didn't fail during the preparation step because of conflicting targets, but during the commit step, because of a md5 error... And sync1006 didn't pass and was not really worth fixing. We have already enough failing pactests more important than these two. sync1008 pass with this patch. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* Kill the dependsonly option.Chantry Xavier2008-03-22
| | | | | | | From the man page : "This is pretty useless and we're not sure why it even exists." Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* Drop case insensitive comparisons in the config parsing.Chantry Xavier2008-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These case insensitive comparisons didn't work in some locales, like tr_TR where upper(i) != I. So a second case sensitive comparison had to be made for each directive. Only keeping case sensitive comparisons make the code cleaner and treat all locales equally. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-March/011445.html Also fix pactests to use the correct case. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add -Rss optionNagy Gabor2008-03-10
| | | | | | | | * -Rss removes all dependencies (including explicitly installed ones). * updated documentation * two pactest files added to test the difference between -Rs and -Rss Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
* Remove trans->targetsNagy Gabor2008-03-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Its implementation was quite broken: * add_loadtarget() might have silently filtered out some targets when replacing an older version. * This was used in sync.c to determine whether a target is implicit or not, which is incorrect behavior. Before this patch we silently removed user confirmed replacements; now we always warn on a replacement. * remove001.py behavior was quite odd in adding same target 5 times to the target list, we can change this behavior to be a failure. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> [Xav: changed remove001 pactest accordingly] Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> [Dan: rewrote commit message] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Remove useless TESTS fileDan McGee2008-03-08
| | | | | | | This hasn't been updated in forever, and a simple python program could regenerate it anyway. Or even grep. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Move -A pactests that are relevant to -U, clean the rest outDan McGee2008-03-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is in anticipation of removing the -A/--add option from the pacman frontend. I've went through each of the pacman pactests that used the -A operation and decided whether they were worth keeping, whether there was already an upgrade test doing the same thing, or whether it should be moved over. The GIT rename log should make several of the moves obvious, but for those that were deleted: add001: handled by upgrade004 add002: worthless add004: worthless add010: handled by upgrade011 add050: handled by upgrade010 Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2008-02-15
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | Conflicts: lib/libalpm/be_files.c lib/libalpm/package.c
| * ensure chk_fileconflicts reads entire file listDan McGee2008-02-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the end of the pB list was reached before the end of pA, we failed to read any remaining files from the pA list. Add an additional loop to ensure all entries of pA are added to the return list regardless of whether we have reached the end of pB. This new loop also eliminates the now-unnecessary check for a null pB, as we need to ensure we are excluding directories in the resulting output anyway. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
| * Fixes file relocation pactestsNagy Gabor2008-02-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes upgrade040.py and upgrade041.py (041 now fails!): * the old pactests didn't check the existence of the relocated file * upgrade041.py was broken due to a typo (missing comma) New upgrade046.py pactest was added (derived from the fixed upgrade041.py). This fails because the file relocation check is _hacked_ to conflict.c, and _alpm_db_find_fileconflicts is not called in case of --force. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2008-02-07
|\|
| * pactest: make more resiliant to missing filesDan McGee2008-02-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a bunch of guards around function calls like open() and stat() to ensure we are not going to get ourselves a python error. This made implementing and testing the new upgrade045 pactest much easier, as its whole purpose was to create a dead symlink and debug a segfault of pacman (which caused no DB entries to be written) to support the previously checked in fix for FS#9235 (commit 0c2206f542ce6df2606586d43f190cd5a423fb13). Both of these cases are now non-fatal in pactest. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | New remove option : -u / --unneeded (FS#6505).Nagy Gabor2008-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With --unneeded option 'pacman -R' doesn't stop in case of dependency error; it removes the needed-dependency targets from the target-list instead. See also: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009653.html . The patch also adds a new causingpkg field to pmdepmissing_t which indicates the to-be-removed package which would cause a dependency break. This is needed, because miss->depend.name may be a provision. miss->causingpkg will be useful in -R dependency error messages too. [Xavier: renamed inducer to causingpkg, removed the _alpm_pkgname_pkg_cmp helper function as requested by Aaron. This might be added by a further commit. Other small cleanups, updated manpage and bash completion.] Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* | libalpm/sync.c : conflicts resolving cleanup.Chantry Xavier2008-01-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original patch from Nagy tried to resolve target vs target conflicts, and so broke the following pactests : sync040, sync041 and sync990 Nagy's proposal to solve this situation was to choose the interactive way, ask the user how to deal with it: either remove pkg1 or remove pkg2 or stop here. So he left this as a TODO. But instead of trying to resolve these conflicts or asking the user, I tried to find a more conservative way, looking at what the current pactests expected: If between the two conflicting packages, one provides the other, pacman will keep that one and remove the other from the target list. That breaks sync893 and sync897. But Dan agreed these two looked weird and should be changed. This commit should close FS#8897, FS#8899 and FS#9024. Reference: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009745.html http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010393.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | New --asexplicit optionNagy Gabor2008-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the symmetric of --asdeps, install packages explicitly. Documentation and completion files were updated accordingly. Added sync301.py and upgrade032.py pactest files to test this. I also made a little modification in ALLDEPS handling too. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* | Move the deptest code from frontend to backend.Chantry Xavier2008-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The deptest code (pacman -T) used by makepkg was mostly in the frontend. There were 2 drawbacks: 1) the public splitdep function returns a pmdepend_t struct, but the _alpm_dep_free function for freeing it is private. So there was a memleak. 2) there is a helper in the backend (satisfycmp in deps.c) which makes this function much easier. So this adds a new public alpm_deptest in libalpm/deps.c, which cleans pacman_deptest in pacman/deptest.c a lot. Besides, alpm_splitdep was made private, because the frontend no longer requires it, and _alpm_dep_free is also private. Finally the deptest001 pactest was extended. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2008-01-14
|\|
| * Change the versioned provision format.Chantry Xavier2008-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the 'provname provver' format to 'provname=provver'. In .PKGINFO, the provisions are copied from the PKGBUILD without quotes. So the provision version was actually handled as a different provision... See FS#9171. Dan: Unfortunately we have to change our original specification for versioned provisions with this patch, but it ends up being the simpler and cleaner solution in the long run, and if there is any time to change it the time is now before many packages have been built. Keeping the ' ' based format would have required us to do special parsing in repo-add, as well as being susceptible to users not using quotes in their provides array. Hopefully this will resolve the issues we had with our initial plan. Sorry for the confusion. Acked-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
| * Rename provision related pactests to provision*.py.Chantry Xavier2008-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Also add 3 new pactests to cover both the -U and -S operations for versioned provisions. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | New reason001.py pactestNagy Gabor2008-01-11
|/ | | | | | | | This pactest demonstrates that we should copy the reason between the to-be-replaced and replaced packages Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Move the fallback on providers from backend to frontend.Chantry Xavier2008-01-09
| | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit e28973169d2e5eda8b64ebdda11ece0dc761d978. This code might fit better in the frontend than in the backend finally. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-November/010150.html I also changed it for fixing FS#8763 : if there is exactly one provider, pacman will pull it and print a warning. if there are several providers, pacman will list them and fail. It's up to the user to pick one. Add sync501 pactest to reflect that.
* conflict.c : fix for FS#8156, detect conflict between symlink and dir.Chantry Xavier2008-01-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous fileconflict check (package vs filesystem) skipped the conflict when the file on the filesystem was a directory or a symlink to a directory, no matter what the file in the package was. Now, the conflict will only be skipped if the file in the package is a directory (so compatible with a dir or a dir symlink on the filesystem). So in the case of 8156 (new fileconflict003 pactest for this case), instead of silently ignoring the extraction of the test symlink, pacman will now fail because of a file conflict between the test symlink in the pkg2 package and the test directory on the filesystem. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* sync.c: add sanity check so we don't dereference a null pointerDan McGee2008-01-05
| | | | | | | | | | Originally noticed in FS#9024, but was fixed in previous changes anyway. However, it doesn't hurt to still check it. Also add a pactest from Chantry Xavier for the original problem to ensure we can't reproduce it. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* conflict.c : fix for upgrade042.Chantry Xavier2008-01-05
| | | | | | | | | | | Thanks to the proactive backup handling, we don't need to add the moving file to the skip_add list. The backup handling will make sure nothing gets overwritten. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010610.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* add.c : fix upgrade026 pactest.Chantry Xavier2008-01-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was the case of the bash packaging error where a file was removed from the package but not the backup array. I just added a sanity check so that only the files from the backup array that are also in the filelist are used. I had to edit upgrade026 pactest slightly : it required the file to be copied to .pacsave instead of moved. But just moving it should be enough, as we agreed on the ML : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010440.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* new upgade042 pactest + bugfix in chk_filedifference.Chantry Xavier2008-01-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a pactest for the relocation of a config file between two packages (case of etc/profile moving from bash to filesystem). While running this pactest, I found out that chk_filedifference didn't work correctly with an empty list as second argument. So that's fixed now. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010610.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* add a new upgrade026 pactest for backup handling.Chantry Xavier2007-12-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | This is the bash case when the /etc/profile file was removed by error from the package, but stayed in the backup array. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-December/003556.html Also fixed a little typo in add.c, but it's disabled code. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* fix two broken pactests because of date localization.Chantry Xavier2007-12-28
| | | | | | | | | | query002 and sync1100 had PACMAN_OUTPUT rules that looked at the build/install date (localized). Instead of looking at the month name, it will now check the year, which should be safer. I also had to add another pactest (query005) for keeping the same coverage. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
* PM_DEP_MOD_LT and PM_DEP_MOD_GT depmods addedNagy Gabor2007-12-19
| | | | | | | | You can use foo<2.0 and foo>2.0 as depend add046.py and add047.py pactests were added to check this Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add real scriptlet checking for pactestAaron Griffin2007-12-10
| | | | | | | | | | Due to commit da1222de2e30aabcae9d17bbfa10bbf0672338af, we can now use fakechroot to completely run scriptlet pactests Use "which" functionality so as not to REQUIRE it for all users Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add a lot more tests (and some pactest fixes) to -Si and -Qi testsDan McGee2007-12-02
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add more pactests to increase code coverageDan McGee2007-12-02
| | | | | | | These new tests test the following ops at least once: -Ss, -Si, -Sl, -Sp, -Qs, -Qi, -T Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add 4 new pactests to get better code coverage by pactestDan McGee2007-12-02
| | | | | | | | I started playing around with gcov today and it showed a few places in the code that we don't test at all. This is the start of ensuring that we execute most of the code in our codebase. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* New sync1005 and sync1006 pactestsNagy Gabor2007-12-01
| | | | | | | | This pactest checks what happens if a package exists in two sync repos. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> [Dan: added sync1006, same test with different versions] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix for sync1003 and sync1004 pactestsNagy Gabor2007-11-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | checkdeps and resolvedeps now take both a remove list and an install list as arguments, allowing dependencies to be calculated correctly. This broke the sync990 pactest, but this pactest used dependencies and provides in an unusual way, so it has been changed. Dan: the sync990 pactest was just plain wrong. It didn't satisfy the dependencies correctly, so should never have succeeded. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> [Dan: some variable renaming, clarification in commit message] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Remove -F/--freshen operationDan McGee2007-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | This operation made sense in the days before sync DBs existed, but it no longer has the same usefulness it once did. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-05 07:55:17 +0000