| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This uses the new public functions to handle targets from the frontend,
like it used to be :
1) alpm_find_dbs_satisfier to find (optionally versioned) package or
provision
2) alpm_find_grp_pkgs to find members for a groups
3) alpm_add_pkg to finally add the pmpkg_t from 1 or 2
Of course, this adds more code to the frontend, but it completely
deprecates sync_target and sync_dbtarget interfaces.
This all-in-one interfaces felt wrong and left no control to the
frontend. A good frontend should just use alpm_add_pkg, with pkg coming
from alpm_db_get_pkg (for normal targets), alpm_find_dbs_satisfier (for
versioned provisions) or alpm_find_grp_pkgs (for groups).
This also opens the way to provide a better group handling in pacman
without constraint from libalpm and callbacks.
In ignore006, only the retcode changes, because no package was found to
satisfy the target (the only possible package is ignored).
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If there are multiple providers in one db, pacman used to just stop at
the first one (both during dependency resolution or for pacman -S
'provision' which uses the same code).
This adds a new conversation callback so that the user can choose which
provider to install. By default (user press enter or --noconfirm), the
first provider is still chosen, so for example the behavior of sync402
and 403 is preserved. But at least the user now has the possibility to
make the right choice in a manual run.
If one of the provider is already installed, it is picked for
reinstall/upgrade, so that provision 002/003 pactest now pass.
$ pacman -S community/smtp-server
:: There are 3 providers available for smtp-server:
1) courier-mta 2) esmtp 3) exim
Which one do you want to install?
Enter a number (default=1):
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These deal with already-installed packages and how they should be the
preferred provider in cases where provider selection now occurs. A few
involve multiple sync repos.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The order was non-deterministic before, and just happened to work for
sync023.py as it was written. Ensure there is some sort of predictable
ordering.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All conditions that this particular rule tested are better served by using a
more specific rule, whether that be checking a package version or whether
files inside the package have changed or still exist.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, go the same route we have always taken with version-release in
libalpm and treat it all as one piece of information. Makepkg is the only
script that knows about epoch as a distinct value; from there on out we will
parse out the components as necessary.
This makes the code a lot simpler as far as epoch handling goes. The
downside here is that we are tossing some compatibility to the wind;
packages using force will have to be rebuilt with an incremented epoch to
keep their special status.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Confirming the current behavior. And yes, the error message is still no
better than it was when this was reported 3.5 years ago.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are probably useful anyway, but also exposed the double file list bug
that will be fixed in a later commit.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No need to use 0/1 when we can use False/True for the force option.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
lib/libalpm/sync.c
test/pacman/tests/ignore007.py
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes FS#19854.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* FS#19854 (--ignore is ignored with groups)
* http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008847.html
(operation aborts when a package from a group is ignored/and user chooses
not to install it)
If a group member is ignored, we expect
a) a question whether to install
b) after saying 'no' to a), the ignored member not to be installed
c) all other group members to be installed
d) pacman to execute successfully
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9d0b33fd3327ae6d2b15f50870c0885a2068d492)
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This creates two packages with extremely long description lines (500KB and
600 KB), causing our archive read code to perform reallocation to store the
whole contents. One of the packages will successfully read while the other
will fail for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When a -Sk or -Uk operation induced a removal of an existing local
package, --dbonly was not in effect and the files were all removed.
Fixing this behavior was already marked as TODO in database012 pactest
------------
TODO: I honestly think the above should NOT delete the original les, it
hould upgrade the DB entry without touching anything on the file stem.
E.g. this test should be the same as:
pacman -R --dbonly dummy && pacman -U --dbonly dummy.pkg.tar.gz
------------
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
[Dan: small coding style touchup]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
when calling '-S repo/group', only group members in <repo> should should
be installed (group members in other repos are ignored)
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
* FS#19854 (--ignore is ignored with groups)
* http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008847.html
(operation aborts when a package from a group is ignored/and user chooses
not to install it)
If a group member is ignored, we expect
a) a question whether to install
b) after saying 'no' to a), the ignored member not to be installed
c) all other group members to be installed
d) pacman to execute successfully
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Split parsing of CLI arguments into separate functions:
parsearg_op (operations)
parsearg_global (global options)
parsearg_{database,query,remove,sync,deptest,upgrade}
Organization strictly follows the manpage (even where the manpage is
incorrect) - these cases will be fixed in the following commits.
Switch cases are copy/pasted and statements unrelated to chosen
operation are deleted.
Parsing logic adjusted as follows:
1) Parse operation
2) If we can bail out early (duplicate op, help/version requested) do so
3) Parse arguments again:
foreach arg:
if arg is operation:
continue
tryparse_args_specific_to_op
if unsuccessful tryparse_args_global
if unsuccessful print error message and exit
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pacman should catch cases in which the passed arguments don't apply to the
current operation (sync/query/...).
Also see FS#20950.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported in FS#20221, we don't always do the right thing when installing
a group and using the --needed option. This was due to the code pulling
packages based on what was already in the transaction's add list, but
completely ignoring the fact that we may have already seen and skipped this
same package in an earlier repository.
Add a list to the private _alpm_sync_pkg() function that allows us to have
this extra information so we don't mistakenly downgrade a package when using
--needed.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The first step for resolving FS#20221. sync023 is the case from the bug
report; sync022 is already working fine but we have no tests at all that
test the --needed option in any form.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than say we can't find the target after saying "No, I guess I don't
want to install this", we should make sure the ignored status gets passed
all the way through. This fixes FS#19866.
Pactest is also included that failed before due to the fact that we normally
treat an unfound package as a reason to exit with a non-zero status.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
Move the test suite to test/pacman in order to make a logical
location for a future makepkg test suite.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
