summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/pacman/tests
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Check empty subdirectory ownershipAllan McRae2012-07-10
| | | | | | | | | | | When checking if a package owns a directory, it is important to check not only that all the files in the directory are part of the package, but also if the directory is part of a package. This catches empty subdirectories during conflict checking for directory to file/symlink replacements. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add conflict for replacing owned empty directoryAllan McRae2012-07-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When two packages own an empty directory, pacman finds no conflict when one of those packages wants to replace the directory with a file or a symlink. When it comes to actually extracting the new file/symlink, pacman sees the directory is still there (we do not remove empty directories if they are owned by a package) and refuses to extract. Detect this potential conflict early and bail. Note that it is a _potential_ conflict and not a guaranteed one as the other package owning the directory could be updated or removed first which would remove the conflict. However, pacman currently can not sort package installation order to ensure this, so this conflict requires manual upgrade ordering. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Revert "Add -S --recursive operation"Dan McGee2012-02-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit f3fa77bcf1d792971c314f8c0de255866e89f3f3 along with making other necessary changes to fully back this (mis)feature out until we can do it correctly. The quick summary here is this was not implemented correctly; provides are not fully taken into account in this logic, and making that happen exposes a lot of other flaws in this code that are covered up later on in the dependency resolving process by several other pieces of convoluted and conditional logic. Tests have been adjusted accordingly. Some test EXISTS conditions have been removed as we already know the package is installed locally, and we also are checking the VERSION condition anyway. With these two related revert commits, we do have some changes in test pass/fail results: * upgrade078.py: does not pass, this is due to --recursive getting removed for -U/-S operations after this commit. * sync302.py: the version checks have been disabled, so this test continues to pass but has been scaled back in scope. * sync303.py: now passes, was failing before. * sync304.py: still failing, was failing before. * sync305.py: now passes, was failing before. * sync306.py: still passes, was passing before. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Revert "Enable recursive/needed sync on SyncFirst"Dan McGee2012-02-15
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 09034520325efcc2e684f05fa7a99c02bad1f5be. Tests affected by this revert have been adjusted; additionally a few EXIST tests have been removed where there is already a VERSION test doing the job for us. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: check return code in some upgrade testsDan McGee2012-02-03
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* add new pactest for syncfirst with recursive depsDave Reisner2012-01-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add 1 failing for the -Su case, and the same case using -S (and passing). This is based on a real (current) issue of upgrading staging chroots with the new pacman in staging for a libarchive build, and a new toolchain in testing. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add two new pactests for pacman upgrade behaviorDan McGee2011-11-30
| | | | | | | | | | Both currently marked as failing. * sync303.py encapsulates the broken behavior reported in FS#27214. * sync304.py shows how packages depending on a specific version of a package in SyncFirst can cause breakage of the dependency resolver. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix issues with replacing unowned symlinksDan McGee2011-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There aretwo seperate issues in the same block of file conflict checking code here: 1) If realpath errored, such as when a symlink was broken, we would call 'continue' rather than simply exit this particular method of resolution. This was likely just a copy-paste mistake as the previous resolving steps all use loops where continue makes sense. Refactor the check so we only proceed if realpath is successful, and continue with the rest of the checks either way. 2) The real problem this code was trying to solve was canonicalizing path component (e.g., directory) symlinks. The final component, if not a directory, should not be handled at all in this loop. Add a !S_ISLNK() condition to the loop so we only call this for real files. There are few other small cleanups to the debug messages that I made while debugging this problem- we don't need to keep printing the file name, and ensure every block that sets resolved_conflict to true prints a debug message so we know how it was resolved. This fixes the expected failures from symlink010.py and symlink011.py, while still ensuring the fix for fileconflict007.py works. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add some unowned symlink replacement testsDan McGee2011-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These should all prevent installation, and yet two of the three tests currently fail. Not good. The best way to see what is going on here is to diff the three new tests side by side- there is only a small difference between the three tests, and that is in the destination of the symlink in question that should never be overwritten. symlink010.py: myprogsuffix -> myprog symlink011.py: myprogsuffix -> broken symlink012.py: myprogsuffix -> otherprog Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: add a better descriptionDan McGee2011-10-11
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add a random pactestDan McGee2011-09-18
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: remove PACMAN_OUTPUT from ldconfig testsDan McGee2011-09-01
| | | | | | | | | This removes the last usages of this rule that aren't explicitly looking at real output from pacman. Notably, these tests depended on one particular debug logger not ever being changed, which is too fragile, not to mention doesn't work at all with --nolog. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add pactest for overflowing date (year 2038 problem)Dan McGee2011-09-01
| | | | | | | | This will work fine on x86_64 (or any platform that has a 64 bit long), but currently fails on i686. This test also stresses the recent changes to accommodate package size values greater than a 32 bit UINT_MAX. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Rework scriptlet tests to not depend on pacman outputDan McGee2011-08-29
| | | | | | | This actually does something in a scriptlet we can check with our normal set of rules, rather than relying on pacman debug output. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix replacement of provider issueDan McGee2011-08-18
| | | | | | | | | When we switched to using alpm_depcmp() in resolving replacments, we had some interesting behavior with regard to providers and packages not found in repositories. Teach the replacement resolving code to not look at provisions at all to be slightly more sane. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix trailing whitespace in whole codebaseDan McGee2011-08-17
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* build-sys: always use $(RM) instead of rm -fDave Reisner2011-08-15
| | | | | | | These are equivalent. Use the autoconf macro for consistency. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* add pactest for replacing a shared providerDave Reisner2011-08-15
| | | | | | | This is currently expected to fail. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest/sync200: check for curl instead of fetchDave Reisner2011-08-15
| | | | | | | | We can't just check for LIBS as curl won't be listed. Instead, look at the length of the LIBCURL var from the Makefile. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: -U --recursivePang Yan Han2011-08-11
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: add sync302 to test recursive syncfirstDave Reisner2011-08-11
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Parse replaces strings as dep strings with version specsDan McGee2011-08-09
| | | | | | | | This is done extremely crudely and is not very efficient, but it does push us down the path of being closer to right, as one additional test now passes. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add a slightly simpler versioned replace testDan McGee2011-08-09
| | | | | | | | | It turns out we have a few problems here which are best tackled independently. The first is simply parsing replacements as dep strings; the second will be dealing with replaces when the original package name still exists in the repository. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Don't trim whitespace when reading database entriesDan McGee2011-08-02
| | | | | | | | | | | We don't write with extra or unknown whitespace, so there is little reason for us to trim it when reading either. This also fixes the hopefully never encountered "paths that start or end with spaces" issue, for which two pactests have been added. The tests also contain other evil characters that we have encountered before and handle just fine, but it doesn't hurt to ensure we don't break such support in the future. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add a new epoch pactestDan McGee2011-07-18
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Handle removal of empty directories properlyDan McGee2011-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This addresses FS#25141. We shouldn't remove every empty directory we come across during the removal process unless it is truly not known to any other package. This will prevent removal of essential directories such as '/var/lock/'. This is accomplished by first checking the empty/non-empty status of a directory, which was previously done implicitly by calling rmdir() and ignoring errors. We do this to avoid the next (new) check in most cases, which is to look at all local packages to see if the to-be-removed directory is present in another packages' filelist. If we do not find it anywhere, then we remove it, else we keep the file around. The pactest has been updated to test more cases, as well as finding a flaw in the original expected to fail case- we need separate DIR and FILE based EXIST rules. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Allow fileconflict if unowned file moving into backup arrayDan McGee2011-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | | The bulk of this commit is adding new tests to ensure the new behavior works without disrupting old behavior. This is a relatively sane maneuver when a package adds a conf file (e.g. '/etc/mercurial/hgrc') that was not previously in the package, but it is placed in the backup array. In essence, we can treat the existing file as having always been a part of the package and do our normal compare/install as pacnew logic checks. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: add a few more checks to fileconflict checksDan McGee2011-07-03
| | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2011-06-27
|\ | | | | | | | | Conflicts: lib/libalpm/conflict.c
| * Ensure a file can be replaced by a directoryDan McGee2011-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This addresses FS#24904. In a normal upgrade case, this replacement seems to work just fine. However, when doing a sync "replace" type upgrade, we weren't properly handling this edge case due to path comparison not ignoring trailing slashes. Fix this by pruning any trailing slashes past a certain point of file conflict resolution where we no longer need them, which allows us to safely detect cases such as now tested in the new pactest. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Add a 'valid' flag to the database objectDan McGee2011-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Start by converting all of our flags to a 'status' bitmask (pkgcache status, grpcache status). Add a new 'valid' flag as well. This will let us keep track if the database itself has been marked valid in whatever fashion. For local databases at the moment we ensure there are no depends files; for sync databases we ensure the PGP signature is valid if required/requested. The loading of the pkgcache is prohibited if the database is invalid. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Do database signature checking at load timeDan McGee2011-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the ideal place to do it as all clients should be checking the return value and ensuring there are no errors. This is similar to pkg_load(). We also add an additional step of validation after we download a new database; a subsequent '-y' operation can potentially invalidate the original check at registration time. Note that this implementation is still a bit naive; if a signature is invalid it is currently impossible to refresh and re-download the file without manually deleting it first. Similarly, if one downloads a database and the check fails, the database object is still there and can be used. These shortcomings will be addressed in a future commit. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | pactest: add retcode=0 to several testsDan McGee2011-06-20
| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Use standard errno codes in return from _alpm_archive_fgetsDan McGee2011-06-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows us to not require the context (e.g. handle) when calling this function. Also beef up the checks in the two callers of this function to bail if the last return code is not ARCHIVE_EOF, which is the expected value. This requires a change to one of the pactest return codes and the overall result of the test, but results in a much safer operating condition whereby invalid database entries will stop the operation. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Add two currently failing test cases from bug reportsDan McGee2011-06-02
| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2011-05-19
|\| | | | | | | | | | | Conflicts: lib/libalpm/trans.c src/pacman/query.c
| * Fix segfault when uninstalling broken backed-up symlinkDan McGee2011-05-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Issue FS#24230. If a symlink is broken and included in the removal process of a package, we blew up and segfaulted due to alpm_compute_md5sum() returning NULL and then performing a strcmp() operation. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
| * Add test for FS#24230, dead backup symlink removalDan McGee2011-05-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | This currently causes a segfault, which is bad news. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Added gpg verification options per repo to the config file.Xavier Chantry2011-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Once we do this, add support for VerifySig to pactest. We just check if the repo name contains Always, Never or Optional to determine the value of VerifySig. The default is Never. pacman uses Always by default but this is not suitable for pactest. Original-work-by: shankar <jatheendra@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Add a pactest showing failed GPG verificationDan McGee2011-03-23
| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* | Add a few pactests for PGP integrationDan McGee2011-03-23
|/ | | | Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Fix handling of ignored packagesPang Yan Han2011-03-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Noted in FS#23342. When the user attempts to install an ignored package and answers no when asked whether to install it, pacman bails out with: "error: target not found: packagename" This is because satisfiers are not found for the package and execution continues to process_group(), where the package is treated as a group (which does not exist). In addition, test ignore006.py is updated with PACMAN_RETCODE=0 since saying no to installing an ignored package should not be considered an error. Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest: use actual regexes in OUTPUT rulesDan McGee2011-03-01
| | | | | | | | | I managed to just make deptest001.py fail by changing a DEBUG-level logger in commit b12be99c89. This should not be this fickle. Enhance the OUTPUT rule to use an actual Python re object when looking for matches, and make a lot of the rules use stronger patterns to match with. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* pactest for removing a required empty directoryAllan McRae2011-02-27
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add test case for util-linux/util-linux-ng name switch and depsDan McGee2011-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | | This case currently fails, but highlights a failure in our install process I experienced the other day. Because we don't do replacement uninstalls inline with the rest of the upgrade uninstalls, we can have a time on our system where a critical package is not installed. I hope no one ever renames glibc. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Continue resolving dependencies rather than bailing on first errorDan McGee2011-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows error messages emitted by the frontend to be a bit more descriptive and not have the annoying "well why didn't you tell me that the first time" problem. If a package had multiple missing deps, we would bail on the first one before rather than finish processing all missing dependencies, and only print one error message. Instead, continue through this entire set of missing deps and append all eventual errors. The added pactest tests this case, as the to be installed package has two missing dependencies. However, pactest does not actually test or see the difference in output from before and after, so it passes in both cases, but it is clearly visible in the logs. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Various small spelling fixes and small tweaksDan McGee2011-02-25
| | | | | | | Nothing that changes behavior here. Spelling fixes and pushing a variable down to the scope it is used. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* Add a new removal smoke testDan McGee2011-02-04
| | | | | | Hint: this will really stress hash table removal. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* make -d less strict; add -dd optionFlorian Pritz2011-01-31
| | | | | | | | | | -d skips checking the version of a dependency. -dd skips the whole dependency check. Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@server-speed.net> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
* add pactests for -SddXavier Chantry2011-01-31
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 (git 2.47.0) at 2024-12-28 02:33:37 +0000