From fcbf63e62c627deae76c1b8cb8c0876c536ed811 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jari Vetoniemi Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:49:26 +0900 Subject: Fresh start --- jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml | 13971 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13971 insertions(+) create mode 100644 jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml (limited to 'jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml') diff --git a/jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml b/jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bfff771 --- /dev/null +++ b/jni/ruby/test/rexml/data/ofbiz-issues-full-177.xml @@ -0,0 +1,13971 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +]> + + + 1 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Documentation + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20030820210924 + website + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-08-13 22:35:10 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Website missing + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-13 22:35:10 + Website is missing from CVS. + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-19 12:09:17 + Website starting to move + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-19 12:11:57 + Changed milestone + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-20 21:09:24 + Website has been imported into CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-19 12:09:17 + issue_status + Status + NEW + STARTED + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-19 12:09:17 + version + Version + unspecified + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-19 12:11:57 + target_milestone + Target Milestone + milestone 1 + not determined + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-20 21:09:24 + issue_status + Status + STARTED + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-20 21:09:24 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 2 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20030824004146 + Product + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-08-23 14:25:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Missing FTL + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-23 14:25:20 + Missing FTL file: + +Error: File not found: /feature/EditFeatureCategoryFeatures.ftl + + + jonesde + 2003-08-24 00:41:46 + Converted JSP to FTL, made some small corrections. + + + jonesde + 2003-08-24 00:41:46 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-08-24 00:41:46 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 3 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20030828103031 + Product + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-08-23 14:27:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Edit Promo Bug + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-23 14:27:14 + When editing a promo rule; the drop down for the current condition contains only +the existing condition (many times). + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:30:31 + #list directive had a type. Fix in CVS. + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:30:31 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:30:31 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 4 + VERIFIED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20030828103057 + Product + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-08-23 14:30:52 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Price Rule Bug + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-23 14:30:52 + When editing a price rule; changing the is "sale price" flag sets properly, +however always displays "no" as the selected choice. + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:20:59 + Fixed conditional on the no button, now appears correctly. + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:30:57 + Done + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:20:59 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:20:59 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + jonesde + 2003-08-28 10:30:57 + issue_status + Status + RESOLVED + VERIFIED + + + + 5 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20030823144138 + Party + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-08-23 14:41:38 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Relationship missing button + + + ajzeneski + 2003-08-23 14:41:38 + View/Edit party relationships page first is still JSP and second is missing the +links to communication event(s). + + + + 6 + CLOSED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20030918144334 + Entity + robdawson + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-09-04 02:09:57 + jonesde + + + + All + Entity Engine ConnectionFactory and DBCPConnectionFactory issues with Oracle + + + robdawson + 2003-09-04 02:09:57 + When using the Inline JDBC Functionality of the Entity Engine to access an Oracle +database the Entity Engine gives SQL no suitable driver exceptions. + +The fix for this involves changing: + loader.loadClass(driverClassName); +to + Class clazz = loader.loadClass(driverClassName); + clazz.newInstance(); +in both the ConnectionFactory and DBCPConnectionFactory classes. + +There will also need to be the appropriate exception handling. + +Please contact me if this requires any clarification. + + + ajzeneski + 2003-09-04 22:15:06 + The message you are getting means that the JDBC drivers for Oracle cannot be +found on the classpath. Contact the users mailing list if you need further help +with this issue. + + + ajzeneski + 2003-09-04 22:17:28 + Sorry; DBCP support is currently outdated and not used due to the fact that +there is no transaction support. It is recommended you use the JOTM/XAPool +connections. This issue will be addressed during a refactor of this class in the +coming months. + + + jonesde + 2003-09-18 14:43:34 + +This issue has been resolved with code changes similar to those recommended. + +HOWEVER: There is one caveat with this: I would NOT recommend running using +either of these blocks of code. Without a transaction aware connection pool +performance will be severely affected or operations may be performed outside of +transactions. So, I wouldn't use straight JDBC or DBCP right now. Hopefully in +the future DBCP will support XADataSources, then it may be an option. + +Later, +-David Jones + + + + ajzeneski + 2003-09-04 22:15:06 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2003-09-04 22:15:06 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + jonesde + 2003-09-18 14:43:34 + issue_status + Status + RESOLVED + CLOSED + + + jonesde + 2003-09-18 14:43:34 + qa_contact + QA Contact + issues@ofbiz + jonesde + + + + 7 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040304194045 + WebTools + fzhu_genshare + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-09-21 07:35:08 + issues@ofbiz + + http://localhost:8080/webtools/control/view/ModelGroupWriter?savetofile=true + + All + "Save Entity Group XML to File" error + + + 8 + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + + + fzhu_genshare + 2003-09-21 07:35:08 + If click "Save Entity Group XML to File" on the webtools, the new page opens and +the following error message appears: + +org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP + +An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp file: null + +Generated servlet error: +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] Compiling 1 source file +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1 +\Temp\Jetty_0_0_0_0_8080__webtools\entity\ModelGroupWriter_jsp.java:72: +cannot resolve symbol +[javac] symbol : variable entityGroupResourceHandler +[javac] location: class org.ofbiz.entity.model.ModelGroupReader +[javac] ResourceHandler resourceHandler = +modelGroupReader.entityGroupResourceHandler; +[javac] ^ +[javac] 1 error + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + *** Issue 8 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** + + + jonesde + 2004-03-04 19:40:45 + lower priority + + + jonesde + 2004-03-04 19:40:45 + priority + Priority + P3 + P4 + + + + 8 + RESOLVED + P3 + DUPLICATE + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20031104010402 + WebTools + fzhu_genshare + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-09-21 07:40:53 + issues@ofbiz + + http://localhost:8080/webtools/control/view/ModelGroupWriter + + All + "Generate Entity Group XML" error + + + 7 + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + + + fzhu_genshare + 2003-09-21 07:40:53 + If clicked "Generate Entity Group XML" on webtools, an error message occurs: + +org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP + +An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp file: null + +Generated servlet error: +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] Compiling 1 source file +[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting. +[javac] C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1 +\Temp\Jetty_0_0_0_0_8080__webtools\entity\ModelGroupWriter_jsp.java:72: +cannot resolve symbol +[javac] symbol : variable entityGroupResourceHandler +[javac] location: class org.ofbiz.entity.model.ModelGroupReader +[javac] ResourceHandler resourceHandler = +modelGroupReader.entityGroupResourceHandler; +[javac] ^ +[javac] 1 error + +It seems the class ResourceHandler is missing. The same error result in several +links of webtools concerning entity engine xml export broken. + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + This issue is a duplicate of #7, they may be different links but they hit the same +request and code. + +*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 7 *** + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 01:04:02 + resolution + Resolution + + DUPLICATE + + + + 9 + RESOLVED + P3 + WONTFIX + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040223211140 + Entity + byersa + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-10-28 09:27:31 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + GenericEntity.getBytes fails with HSQLDB + + + byersa + 2003-10-28 09:27:31 + getBytes internally casts to ByteWrapper which causes a ClassCastException. +Casting directly to byte[] seems to work. + +Don't know if it fails with other dbs. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-23 21:11:40 + This does not appear to be something that can be fixed in OFBiz, it appears to be a bug in HSQLDB, and +only in certain versions. Trying it with an earlier version it worked, but various other things didn't. We +may just have to be patient until HSQLDB has another stable release. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-23 21:11:40 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-02-23 21:11:40 + resolution + Resolution + + WONTFIX + + + + 10 + RESOLVED + P5 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630193003 + Service + byersa + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2003-10-31 08:53:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + missing or incorrect service parameter message + + + byersa + 2003-10-31 08:53:59 + If possible, I think it would be very helpful to developers if the message that +informs on invalid service parameter conditions would clearly indicate whether +it is in the IN or OUT mode that the problem is occurring. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:17:42 + changed to enhancement + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:49:18 + reassigned + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:30:03 + The ServiceValidationException has been updated to support missing and extra fields as well as +knowing which "mode" (IN/OUT) the error occured in. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:17:42 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:17:42 + priority + Priority + P3 + P5 + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:49:17 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:30:03 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:30:03 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 11 + RESOLVED + P2 + INVALID + Components + CVS + PC + jonesde + 20031104002629 + Content + cyf + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-11-03 22:26:18 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Windows 2000 + "response.sendRedirect" in jsp could not take effect + + + cyf + 2003-11-03 22:26:18 + I have write a test.jsp code(like): +..... +hello world! +<%response.sendRedirect("control/main");%> +.... + +define : +in controller.xml: +<request-map uri="test" edit="true"> + <response name="success" type="view" value="test"/> + <response name="error" type="view" value="error"/> +</request-map> +..... +<view-map name="test" type="region"/> + +in region also configued + +when I test the page : +it's appear "hello world!",but didn't redirect. + +When I use this code as jsp page in normal web app,redirect can take effect. + +I think this is a bug of in region process. + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 00:26:29 + +If I understand your complaint correctly it is because the way you organized +things the response output stream is committed before the sendRedirect is +called. There is absolutely nothing that can be done about this. + +If you want to send a redirect you should do so in an event or a non-region view +(and non-jpublish for that matter). Those composite view tools are meant for +generating views and involve templates that may cause the response to be +committed before you wrapped view is even called. + +BTW, this may be more appropriate as a question on the users list, not as a defect +bug report. + +Later, +-David Jones + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 00:26:29 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-11-04 00:26:29 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 12 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040223213513 + Entity + quake_wang + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-11-04 01:39:16 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + entity cache is not synchronized with DB + + + quake_wang + 2003-11-04 01:39:16 + Quake, + +It might make sense to have an issue created on the ofbiz.dev.java.net +site that covers this problem, since it may take some time to resolve. +Could you create one there? It could just include text from messages +send back and forth in this email thread. + +Thanks, +-David + +On Nov 3, 2003, at 6:57 PM, Quake_Wang wrote: + +> The immutable flag can solve some cache synchronize issues, it will +> help for debugging. But, please consider this scenario: +> +> Service A: +> OK, now base on policy: "NEVER read from the cache if you are planning +> on updating", we directly read from DB, +> order = findByPK ("Order", 10000); +> order.set("status", "DEF"); +> order.store(); +> +> +> Service B: +> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +> just query, do not change any fields, entity engine will put the order +> 10000 with "DEF" status in cache, after some other operations (not on +> the order generic value) throw exception, rolled back service A and B, +> then PKCache is not synchronized with DB too, the immutable flag can +> not help any...... +> +> You wrote a service using cache for better performance, and someone +> may assembly your service in same transaction (group service, ECA +> service), the synchronizing may broken, it's really hard to find such +> problem. +> +> Any ideas? +> +> Quake +> +> -----Original Message----- +> From: David Jones [mailto:jonesde@ofbiz.org] +> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:05 PM +> To: dev@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Dev - Important - [Bug] PKCache is not +> synchronized +> with DB +> +> +> +> Because of the possibility that this is happening and causing +> previously unexplained problems, I decided to go ahead and implement +> the immutable feature on the GenericEntity. This is now in CVS, but may +> cause problems with current code (and will most likely in many cases). +> Do disable this just comment out the line near the beginning of the set +> method in GenericEntity.java. It is around line 248 in the current +> revision of the file. +> +> I fixed a few places that had this problem, including createCustomer in +> ecommerce and the userLogin service. Creating a new customer and going +> through the checkout process works fine now, but variations on the way +> I did it may break. +> +> If we have too many problems with this, I'm okay with disabling it +> temporarily, but it would be nice to go this direction in the future. +> It will help resolve the possibility that strange things happen because +> things are being changed in the cache when they shouldn't be and the +> cache is out of sync with the database, ie is dirty. +> +> Feel free to report bugs along these lines, or better yet send +> patches... +> +> Later, +> -David +> +> +> On Nov 3, 2003, at 5:24 AM, David Jones wrote: +> +>> +>> Quake, +>> +>> Yes, I know this is a problem, although I had forgotten about it since +>> it hasn't come up for a long time. +>> +>> Our official answer on this, related to the use of the cache in +>> general is: NEVER read from the cache if you are planning on updating +>> something. It's tempting to change the GenericValue object to have an +>> unchangeable flag that is set for all versions that go into the +>> cache.... +>> +>> I agree with you, there doesn't seem to be an easy way to +>> automatically clear the cache on a rollback. In most cases the +>> rollback doesn't even go through the Entity Engine, it is done in +>> external code. So, the Entity Engine never gets a notification of the +>> rollback, and if it did it would have to remember every operation that +>> happened during that transaction so it could clear those dirty cache +>> entries. +>> +>> Thus the policy: never use the cache to read when you are planning on +>> writing to the database. And yeah, maybe I should throw some code in +>> there to enforce this... Any thoughts from anyone on that? +>> +>> Later, +>> -David +>> +>> +>> +>> On Nov 3, 2003, at 4:45 AM, Quake_Wang wrote: +>> +>>> Found a bug in the PKCache, below is the scenario +>>> +>>> Service A: +>>> 1. find an order with the order No. 10000, dummy code: +>>> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +>>> assume we get an order with the status "ABC"; +>>> +>>> 2. set the order status to "DEF" and store, dummy code: +>>> order.set("status", "DEF"); +>>> order.store(); +>>> +>>> Service B: +>>> 1. find order 10000 again, dummy code: +>>> order = findByPKCache("Order", 10000); +>>> If the service A and B are in the same transaction (ex, group service +>>> or ECA service), entity engine will get the order with "DEF" status +>>> and put it in the PK cache. +>>> +>>> 2. some other operations, throw exception +>>> Service A and B are rolled back, as the result, the PKCache is not +>>> synchronized with DB: +>>> DB: order 10000, status "ABC" +>>> PKCache: order 10000, status "DEF" +>>> +>>> I spent some time to trace this bug, but can not find an easy way to +>>> fix it, just simply change the findByPKCache to findByPK in service +>>> B. +>>> I'm sending out this email in hopes of helping who may encounter the +>>> same problem and receiving a better fix method. +>>> +>>> Regards +>>> Quake +>>> +>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>> +>> +>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> +> +> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> +> +> --------------------------------------------------------------------- +> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net + + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ofbiz.dev.java.net +For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ofbiz.dev.java.net + + + jonesde + 2004-02-23 21:35:13 + +Just a note on this. To fix it there need to be ThreadLocal caches that are maintained by a class that +implements the Synchronization interface for transactions. The idea would be that cache reads look in +the ThreadLocal cache first, then in the global cache, cache writes put everything in the ThreadLocal +cache and when the transaction is committed all ThreadLocal cache entries go into the global cache. +-David + + + + 13 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20031112065558 + Entity + byersa + not determined + DEFECT + 2003-11-12 06:15:27 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + setNonPKFields + + + byersa + 2003-11-12 06:15:27 + I had a situation in which I used setNonPKFields to populate an entity that had +createdData and lastModifiedDate from parameters thinking that it would be a +sort of parameter map. My intention was to then add the individual fields to a +service input, but it turns out that instead of converting the date string to +DateTime format, it kept them as strings and the service complained. I guess the +GenericValue only converts datatypes during the persistence phase? If that is +the case, it would be useful if it converted up loading. + + + jonesde + 2003-11-12 06:55:58 + This is really not the responsibility of the GenericValue object (or really the +GenericEntity object). This is difficult to handle as a defect report and should +be sent to the dev mailing for discussion of the best way to go about what you +are trying to do. The email message should perhaps include more detail about the +overall goal you are trying to accomplish. Note that the GenericEntity, at the +moment, does not enforce types going in, but may be changed to do that and throw +an exception if the type is wrong. -David + + + jonesde + 2003-11-12 06:55:58 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2003-11-12 06:55:58 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 14 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + Macintosh + issues@ofbiz + 20040107162053 + Order + jonesde + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-01-07 16:20:53 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Order Summary pages don't show free shipping promo + + + jonesde + 2004-01-07 16:20:53 + Here is a description from Si Chen who reported the problem: + +One thing that I noticed that is anomalous, though, is that the order review +pages still show an estimate for shipping charges, even though the customer +should get free shipping. It seems that the checkout review pages are using +org.ofbiz.order.shoppingcart.shipping.ShippingEvents.getShipEstimate, while on +actual checkout it is using +org.ofbiz.order.order.OrderReadHelper.getShippingTotal. + +The former is not taking into account shipping adjustments. + + + + 15 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040210064750 + Order + nowpulse + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-10 01:36:16 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Order Stats showing incorrect YTD info + + + nowpulse + 2004-02-10 01:36:16 + The YTD info is incorrect since the Java month starts at 0 instead of 1. + +ofbiz/components/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/order/orderstats.bsh +On Line 71 the 1 should be replaced with a 0 + +cal.set(Calendar.MONTH, 0); + +thank you, +sterling + + + jonesde + 2004-02-10 06:47:50 + Fixed as recommended. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-10 06:47:50 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-02-10 06:47:50 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 16 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040527233859 + Product + jonesde + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-02-24 02:56:29 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Limit Categories Shown in Drop Downs + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 02:56:29 + Add "show in drop-down" option ProductCategory, filter by it in all combo style category drop downs, +and change existing category drop-downs to be combo-boxes, include those on the EditProduct, +EditProductCategories, EditCategory, EditCategoryProducts, EditPromoRules pages. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:38:59 + Some progress has been made on this, but something still needs to be done with the form tool, etc to +limit the drop downs. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 11:59:21 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:38:59 + priority + Priority + P1 + P4 + + + + 17 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040318120731 + Product + jonesde + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-02-24 02:58:45 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Filter Promotion Products to exclude discontinued + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 02:58:45 + Add code to the ProductPromoWorker to (perhaps optionally) filter products included by the +salesDiscontinuationDate, and of course make sure the category member from/thru dates are being +honored. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:00:44 + Now implemented. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:00:44 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:00:44 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:07:31 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 18 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040318120740 + Product + jonesde + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-24 03:01:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Back ordered, or insufficient quantities not handled right + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 03:01:49 + It appears that when a product is back-ordered, or reserved in excess of the AvailableToPromise the +calculations and setting of values are messed up. + +Here is a report on this from Bryce Ewing on Feb 5th, 2004: + +================================================= +I have found something that appears to be a bug (but I am not totally sure), I will explain this in two +cases below: + +case 1: buy 1 item of product1 with no inventory + - inventory item created with 0 on hand, and -1 available to promise + - order item inventory res created with quantity of 1 and quantity not available of 1 + +case 2: buy 2 items of product2 with 1 item in inventory + - inventory item updated with 1 on hand, and -1 available to promise + - order item inventory res created with quantity of 2 and quantity not available of 0 + +For case 1 the system is doing exactly what I would expect, but in case 2 I would have expected that +the order item inventory res record would have had a quantity not available of 1 rather than 0. + +Am I mistaken in this expectation, or is this infact a bug? +================================================= + +Here is a comment on some apparently related findings by Jacopo Cappellato: + +================================================= +I'm studying the simple method InventoryServices.reserveProductInventory +that implements the inventory reservation of on order/order item, and I've +got a question about this issue. +What is the meaning of the quantityNotAvailable field in +OrderItemInventoryRes entity? Where and how is it used (or intended to be +used for)? I've noticed that this quantity is considered in the pick list +reports... + +Probably the quantityNotAvailable field should contain the quantity reserved +that caused inventory item's atp to be less than zero: if so, why in the +reserveProductInventory method the quantityNotAvailable is set only in line +498 and not also after line 458? And in which way, once set, could this +quantity return to zero? +================================================= + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 18:35:45 + After a patch from Bryce Ewing it appears to be fixed. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 18:35:45 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-02-24 18:35:45 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:07:40 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 19 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120748 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-24 06:44:51 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Patch for bug in the Inventory Receive function + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 06:44:51 + In Facility manager, when you receive a purchase order delivered with more than +one shipments and you select to receive only one shipment the proposed +quantities are the quantities of the original purchase order and not the +quantities of the shipment. +In my patches I tried to change the minimum amount of code and the +result is that the code is not well written... obviously feel free to change +my code. +PS: I submitted this patches to the dev list in january 2004. +PPS: the two patches are in Unified Output Format + + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl +=================================================================== +RCS +file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.f +tl,v +retrieving revision 1.5 +diff -u -r1.5 receiveInventory.ftl +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl + 17 Dec 2003 22:46:36 -0000 1.5 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/inventory/receiveInventory.ftl + 14 Jan 2004 11:05:06 -0000 +@@ -312,6 +312,9 @@ + </tr> + <#list purchaseOrderItems as orderItem> + <#assign defaultQuantity = orderItem.quantity - receivedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double> ++ <#if shipment?has_content> ++ <#assign defaultQuantity = shippedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double - receivedQuantities +[orderItem.orderItemSeqId]?double> ++ </#if> + <#if 0 < defaultQuantity> + <#assign orderItemType = orderItem.getRelatedOne("OrderItemType")> + <input type="hidden" name="orderId_o_${rowCount}" +value="${orderItem.orderId}"> + + + + + + + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.4 +diff -u -r1.4 receiveInventory.bsh +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 25 Aug 2003 15:28:00 -0000 + 1.4 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 14 Jan 2004 11:08:14 -0000 +@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ + shipment = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("Shipment", UtilMisc.toMap +("shipmentId", shipmentId)); + } + ++shippedQuantities = new HashMap(); + purchaseOrderItems = null; + if (purchaseOrder != null) { + if (product != null) { +@@ -80,14 +81,18 @@ + exprs = new ArrayList(); + while (issueIter.hasNext()) { + issuance = issueIter.next(); +- exprs.add(new EntityExpr("orderItemSeqId", EntityOperator.EQUALS, +issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))); ++ exprs.add(new EntityExpr("orderItemSeqId", EntityOperator.EQUALS, +issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))); ++ double issuanceQty = issuance.getDouble("quantity").doubleValue(); ++ if (shippedQuantities.containsKey(issuance.getString +("orderItemSeqId"))) { ++ issuanceQty += ((Double)shippedQuantities.get +(issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"))).doubleValue(); ++ } ++ shippedQuantities.put(issuance.getString("orderItemSeqId"), +issuanceQty); + } + purchaseOrderItems = EntityUtil.filterByOr(orderItems, exprs); + } else { + purchaseOrderItems = purchaseOrder.getRelated("OrderItem"); + } + } +- + receivedQuantities = new HashMap(); + if (purchaseOrderItems != null && purchaseOrderItems.size() > 0) { + context.put("firstOrderItem", EntityUtil.getFirst(purchaseOrderItems)); +@@ -100,7 +105,13 @@ + if (receipts != null && receipts.size() > 0) { + recIter = receipts.iterator(); + while (recIter.hasNext()) { +- rec = recIter.next(); ++ rec = recIter.next(); ++ if (shipment != null) { ++ if (rec.getString("shipmentId") == null || ++ !rec.getString("shipmentId").equals(shipment.getString +("shipmentId"))) { ++ continue; ++ } ++ } + accepted = rec.getDouble("quantityAccepted"); + rejected = rec.getDouble("quantityRejected"); + if (accepted != null) +@@ -140,6 +151,7 @@ + context.put("product", product); + context.put("shipments", shipments); + context.put("shipment", shipment); ++context.put("shippedQuantities", shippedQuantities); + context.put("purchaseOrderItems", purchaseOrderItems); + context.put("receivedQuantities", receivedQuantities); + context.put("rejectReasons", rejectReasons); + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 06:55:45 + Created an attachment (id=1) +Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:35:22 + The changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo! + + + text/plain + 1 + 2004-02-24 06:55:45 + Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl + 1 + receiveInventory.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/1/receiveInventory.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 06:55:45 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=1) +Patch files in UOF for receiveInventory,bsh and receiveInventory.ftl + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:35:22 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:35:22 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:07:48 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 20 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120758 + Party + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-24 07:36:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + List All Visits link in the Party Profile page returns an error with 0 visits + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:36:50 + List All Visits link in the Party Profile page returns an error with 0 visits +(see attached patch file) due to wrong bsh code. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:38:20 + Created an attachment (id=2) +Patch for bug in uof + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:39:57 + The changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo! + + + text/plain + 2 + 2004-02-24 07:38:20 + Patch for bug in uof + 1 + showvisits.bsh.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/2/showvisits.bsh.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:38:20 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=2) +Patch for bug in uof + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:39:57 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:39:57 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:07:58 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 21 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120807 + Party + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-24 07:40:56 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + findparty page returns JavaScript errors when clicking on the LookupParty link and when the lookup fields are hidden + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:40:56 + findparty page returns JavaScript errors when clicking on the LookupParty link +and when the lookup fields are hidden. The attached patch should fix the +problem. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:41:29 + Created an attachment (id=3) +Patch for bug in uof + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:44:01 + Your changes are in CVS. Thanks Jacopo! + + + text/plain + 3 + 2004-02-24 07:41:29 + Patch for bug in uof + 1 + findparty.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/3/findparty.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 07:41:29 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=3) +Patch for bug in uof + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:44:01 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 06:44:01 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:07 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 22 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040318115951 + Order + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-24 08:52:07 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Errors in order entry when "Payment Already Received" type is selected. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 08:52:08 + In Order Entry: +when you finalize an order and, in the "Order Entry Payment +Settings" page, you select the "Payment Already Received" type, in the +following page you get JavaScript errors when you click over +the links (stating that the object "document.billsetupform" doesn't exist); +and so you cannot submit the order. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 07:08:20 + +This has been an issue for a while now. It's good to have it in the tracking system since it may not get +fixed right away. Andy is more aware of what is happening there than I am, so he may have more +feedback on it. -David + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 07:08:20 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 07:08:20 + priority + Priority + P2 + P3 + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 11:59:51 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 23 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040318120006 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-24 08:56:40 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Inventory receive ignores the inventory item id field. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 08:56:40 + In Facility Manager -> Inventory receive: +it always creates a new inventory item even if the "inventory item id" optional +field is filled with an existing inventory item id. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:38:11 + reassigned + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:38:11 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:00:06 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 24 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040318120024 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-24 09:01:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Receive return: it always creates serialized inventory items. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-24 09:01:59 + In Facility Manager -->Receive return + +it always creates a serialized inventory item (even if 'non-serialized' is +selected) and so the received quantities are lost (if more than one). + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:38:55 + reassigned + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:38:55 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:00:24 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 25 + RESOLVED + P2 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040318120814 + Accounting + jonesde + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-25 14:58:53 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Permission Checks missing in various part of Accounting Manager + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 14:58:53 + Various pages in the Accounting Manager have no view permission checking, including the billing +account, invoice, etc pages. + + + jaz + 2004-02-25 15:36:03 + I'm not involved in this project. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 16:13:54 + +Fixed assigned to mistake. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:48:28 + All components have a default VIEW permission based on the component configuration. Each page no +longer needs to have the added code as long as require auth is set in the controller.xml file. The +checkLogin event will make sure the user has the default permission for the specific component. +Additional permissions are only necessary when not using the default permission. + + + jaz + 2004-02-25 15:36:03 + assigned_to + Assigned To + jaz + jonesde + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 16:13:54 + assigned_to + Assigned To + jonesde + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:48:28 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:48:28 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:14 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 26 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040308115822 + Order + jonesde + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-25 21:11:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Billing Account Errors + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:11:36 + This issue was reported by Si Chen, Olivier Heintz, and some others. + +The following is some text from an email fro Si Chen on Jan 26, 2004; the attached patch is also from +this email. + +======================================= +Hello. After some work we have tracked down the problem with using +billingAccount in the order manager and were able to fix it. The +problem is stated in the order manager's billsettings.ftl, it was +passing in "EXT_BILLACT|10000" for the checkoutPaymentId instead of +separate checkoutPaymentId and billingAccountId. Olivier had suggested +a good patch earlier which parses this form of checkoutPaymentId in the +CheckOutEvents.java. We took a different approach and used code from +ecommerce to pass both checkoutPaymentId and billingAccountId. We also +fixed CheckOutEvents.java to get the billingAccountId from the request +and associate it with the cart. Both are shown in the attached patch. + +One last problem: in ecommerce, in checkoutpayment.ftl, gift cards, +credit cards, and billing accounts are all using "amount_<account_id>" +as the name of the input fields. As a result, when the +toggleBillingAccount javascript function tries to toggle the billing +account selected for entering the amount to pay, it gets confused and +cannot do this. As a result, when you use the multi-page rather than +express checkout in ecommerce, it does not work properly. I'll be happy +to elaborate on this if you need me to. +======================================= + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:14:01 + Created an attachment (id=4) +Patch to fix BillingAccount issues + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 11:58:22 + Applied patch; fixed JS in ecommerce + + + text/plain + 4 + 2004-02-25 21:14:01 + Patch to fix BillingAccount issues + 1 + BillingAccountError.patch + 3 + jonesde + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/4/BillingAccountError.patch + + + jonesde + 2004-02-25 21:14:01 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=4) +Patch to fix BillingAccount issues + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 11:58:22 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 11:58:22 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 11:58:22 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 27 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120822 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-26 03:20:00 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Patch for missing pagedef file for popup template that causes lookup error (due to i18n changes) + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:20:00 + The lookup link in New Event -> Parties page is broken. +The popup template doesn't run the envsetup script that loads the localized +labels. + +PATCH: add a file named "popup.xml" to the template folder containing the +following lines: + +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<page> + <template-action name="/includes/envsetup.bsh"/> +</page> + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:16:55 + +I have added the popup.xml file to CVS. Thanks for sending it over Jacopo. + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:16:55 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:16:55 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:22 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 28 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040806161040 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-26 03:32:11 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Added lookup link for parties in month view + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:32:11 + Added lookup link for parties in month view. +All the stuff was already in place... I just added the link. +However I think this is a very useful enhancement. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:32:44 + Created an attachment (id=5) +Patch in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-03 08:10:20 + Changed issue type as per email from Jacopo. + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:10:40 + Thanks Jacopo, this is now in CVS. + + + text/plain + 5 + 2004-02-26 03:32:44 + Patch in UOF + 1 + month.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/5/month.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:32:44 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=5) +Patch in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-03 08:10:20 + issue_type + Issue Type + ENHANCEMENT + PATCH + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:00:44 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:10:40 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:10:40 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 29 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120831 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-26 03:56:48 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + When creating a new event from calendar, start and end date were not filled properly in the form + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:56:48 + When creating a new event from calendar, start and end date were not filled +properly in the event form. +The two patches (one for the event.ftl file and one for the event.bsh file) +will solve this problem. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:59:24 + Created an attachment (id=6) +Patch for event.bsh in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:59:58 + Created an attachment (id=7) +Patch for event.ftl file in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:28:02 + Your changes are in CVS, thanks Jacopo! + + + text/plain + 6 + 2004-02-26 03:59:24 + Patch for event.bsh in UOF + 1 + event.bsh.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/6/event.bsh.patch + + + text/plain + 7 + 2004-02-26 03:59:58 + Patch for event.ftl file in UOF + 1 + event.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/7/event.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:59:24 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=6) +Patch for event.bsh in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 03:59:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=7) +Patch for event.ftl file in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:28:02 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:28:02 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:31 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 30 + NEW + P5 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040308175050 + Order + jackhung + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-26 04:17:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fail to approval order + + + jackhung + 2004-02-26 04:17:49 + 19285437[ ControlServlet.java:133:DEBUG] [[[updateactivityassign] Servlet +Starting, doing setup- total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]] +19285438[ ControlServlet.java:182:DEBUG] [[[updateactivityassign] Setup +done, doing Event(s) and View(s)- total:0.0,since last([updateactivityas...):0.0]] +19285440[ RequestHandler.java:200:INFO ] [Processing Request]: +updateactivityassign +19285744[ WfProcessMgrImpl.java:106:INFO ] [WfProcessMgr.init] : Create +process manager (org.ofbiz.order[20030730144901] / ProcessOrder[20030730144901]) +19285890[ BshUtil.java:75 :ERROR] BSH Evaluation error. +Sourced file: <Inline eval of: approvalCode.equals("0"); > : Attempt to resolve +method: equals() on undefined variable or class name: approvalCode : at Line: 1 +: in file: <Inline eval of: approvalCode.equals("0"); > : approvalCode .equals ( +"0" ) + + at bsh.UtilEvalError.toEvalError(UtilEvalError.java:82) + at bsh.UtilEvalError.toEvalError(UtilEvalError.java:87) + at bsh.BSHMethodInvocation.eval(BSHMethodInvocation.java:79) + at bsh.BSHPrimaryExpression.eval(BSHPrimaryExpression.java:69) + at bsh.Interpreter.evalParsedScript(Interpreter.java:1104) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:590) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:616) + at bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:606) + at org.ofbiz.base.util.BshUtil.eval(BshUtil.java:64) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfExecutionObjectImpl.evalBshCondition(WfExecutionObjectImpl.java:718) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.getTransFrom(WfProcessImpl.java:477) + at org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.queueNext(WfProcessImpl.java:298) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfProcessImpl.activityComplete(WfProcessImpl.java:286) + at org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfActivityImpl.complete(WfActivityImpl.java:408) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.impl.WfAssignmentImpl.complete(WfAssignmentImpl.java:175) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.client.WorkflowClient.complete(WorkflowClient.java:266) + at +org.ofbiz.workflow.client.WorkflowServices.completeAssignment(WorkflowServices.java:418) + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:08:46 + I cannot duplicate this problem; please provide more information or we will have to close this has no +longer an issue. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:50:50 + reassigned + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:08:46 + issue_status + Status + NEW + STARTED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:08:46 + op_sys + OS/Version + Linux + All + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:08:46 + rep_platform + Platform + PC + All + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:08:46 + short_desc + Summary + Fail to approval order + Fail to approval order + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:50:50 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:50:50 + issue_status + Status + STARTED + NEW + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:50:50 + priority + Priority + P2 + P5 + + + + 31 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120101 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-26 05:39:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Error message when you try to create new contact information under an event + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 05:39:36 + An error message is returned when you try to create new contact information +under an event: Cannot locate service by name (createWorkEffortContactMech) + +This is the complete message: + +ERROR: Could not complete the Create an email address for WorkEffort process +[problem invoking the [createWorkEffortContactMech] service with the map named +[context] containing [{locale=en_US, infoString=foo@bar.com, userLogin= +[GenericEntity:UserLogin][partyId,admin(java.lang.String)][disabledDateTime,null +()][passwordHint,null()][createdTxStamp,null()][successiveFailedLogins,null()] +[enabled,Y(java.lang.String)][userLoginId,admin(java.lang.String)] +[currentPassword,ofbiz(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,null()] +[lastUpdatedStamp,null()][createdStamp,null()], workEffortId=10030, +contactMechTypeId=EMAIL_ADDRESS}]: Cannot locate service by name +(createWorkEffortContactMech)] + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:01 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 32 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040409054533 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-26 05:50:01 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Errors that prevent adding a new phase to a project. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 05:50:01 + It's impossible to add a new phase to a project. Even if you fill all the +fields of the new phase form when you press the 'create' button you get an +error in the system log (however no error messages are shown in the html page). + +This is the complete error message: + +1160388[ ServiceDispatcher.java:309:ERROR] Service Error [createPhase]: ERROR: +Could not complete the Create Project Phase process [problem creating the newEnt +ity value: while inserting: [GenericEntity:WorkEffortAssoc][createdTxStamp,2004- +02-26 14:44:26.096(java.sql.Timestamp)][workEffortIdTo,10034(java.lang.String)][ +workEffortIdFrom,10031(java.lang.String)][workEffortAssocTypeId,WORK_EFF_BREAKDO +WN(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2004-02-26 14:44:26.096(java.sql.Timest +amp)][createdStamp,2004-02-26 14:44:26.106(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp +,2004-02-26 14:44:26.106(java.sql.Timestamp)] (SQL Exception while executing the + following:INSERT INTO WORK_EFFORT_ASSOC (WORK_EFFORT_ID_FROM, WORK_EFFORT_ID_TO +, WORK_EFFORT_ASSOC_TYPE_ID, SEQUENCE_NUM, FROM_DATE, THRU_DATE, LAST_UPDATED_ST +AMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, + ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) ([-5005] (at 124): Missing non-NULL value))] + + + jacopo + 2004-04-09 05:45:33 + David Jones has fixed this problem in date 2004-04-08 (see the +thread "createphase ERROR in OFBiz 3.0 and OFBiz CVS versions" in the dev-list). + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:18 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2004-04-09 05:45:33 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-04-09 05:45:33 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 33 + RESOLVED + P4 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20050209023142 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-26 06:00:26 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + When you create a new request and you don't fill correctly all the fields no error messages are shown + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 06:00:26 + When you create a new request and you don't fill correctly all the fields no +error messages are shown. + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:31:42 + Fixed after the refactoring to screen widget. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:30 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:31:42 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:31:42 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 34 + RESOLVED + P5 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120838 + Order + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-26 06:11:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Little JavaScript in "find returns" when lookup fields are hidden + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 06:11:14 + Little JavaScript in "find returns" when lookup fields are hidden + +Patch for findReturns.ftl is attached. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 06:11:49 + Created an attachment (id=8) +Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 11:18:49 + Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for sending that over. + + + text/plain + 8 + 2004-02-26 06:11:49 + Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF + 1 + findReturn.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/8/findReturn.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 06:11:49 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=8) +Patch for findReturn.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 11:18:49 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 11:18:49 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:38 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 35 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040308103928 + E-Commerce + razorb + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-26 06:18:48 + issues@ofbiz + + http://localhost:8080/ecommerce/control/product/~category_id=100/~product_id=GZ-1006 + + All + Single variant combo doesn't select properly + + + razorb + 2004-02-26 06:18:48 + Using the drop down menu to select a variantion i.e. LGPL does not set the +selection on the menu. Using the swatch/images does correctly set the menu +selection and allows adding to the basket. + +I suspect a little JS error somewhere for single variant items. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 06:52:49 + +I just reproduced this against the latest code base, appears to still be an issue with single feature type +virtual products. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 09:54:51 + Updated since this is a CVS bug and updated status + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:39:28 + fixed JS bugs in productdetail + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 06:52:48 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + jonesde + 2004-02-26 06:52:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P1 + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 09:54:51 + issue_status + Status + NEW + STARTED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 09:54:51 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:39:28 + issue_status + Status + STARTED + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 10:39:28 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 36 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120846 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-26 23:17:51 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility Manager: in 'inventory receive' the type of order is not checked and it's possible to receive a sales order if you enter its id in the 'purchase order id' field + + + jacopo + 2004-02-26 23:17:51 + Facility Manager: in 'inventory receive' the type of order is not checked and +it's possible to receive a sales order if you enter its id in the 'purchase +order id' field. + +This is the patch in UOF for the receiveInventory.bsh file (pay attention that +some days ago I've submitted a patch for the same file against the same CVS +release): + +Index: ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.4 +diff -u -r1.4 receiveInventory.bsh +--- ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 25 Aug 2003 15:28:00 -0000 + 1.4 ++++ ofbiz/components/product/webapp/facility/WEB- +INF/actions/inventory/receiveInventory.bsh 27 Feb 2004 07:17:08 -0000 +@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ + purchaseOrder = null; + if (purchaseOrderId != null && purchaseOrderId.length() > 0) { + purchaseOrder = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("OrderHeader", UtilMisc.toMap +("orderId", purchaseOrderId)); ++ if (purchaseOrder != null && !"PURCHASE_ORDER".equals +(purchaseOrder.getString("orderTypeId"))) { ++ purchaseOrder = null; ++ } + } + + product = null; + + + jonesde + 2004-02-28 11:58:13 + The patch is in CVS. + + + jonesde + 2004-02-28 11:58:13 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-02-28 11:58:13 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:46 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 37 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120856 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-27 02:05:25 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility Manager: error message when trying to confirm stock moves needed. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 02:05:25 + In the Facility Manager, int the PickList -> Stock Moves page, if I try to +confirm the "stock moves needed" proposed by the system I get the following +error: + +Error calling event: org.ofbiz.content.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: No +rows to process + +And the movements are not performed. + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 17:22:23 + This is caused by some code that was added to display warning messages that wiped out the rowCount +variable. The warning message loop now uses a variable names messageCount. + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 17:22:23 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 17:22:23 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:08:56 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 38 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120905 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-27 02:23:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct page caused a controller error. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 02:23:36 + Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct +page caused a controller error. + +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl file is attached. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 02:24:16 + Created an attachment (id=9) +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:38:50 + Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for the patch Jacopo. + + + text/plain + 9 + 2004-02-27 02:24:16 + Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF + 1 + EditShipmentItems.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/9/EditShipmentItems.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 02:24:16 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=9) +Patch for EditShipmentItems.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:38:50 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:38:50 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:09:05 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 39 + NEW + P2 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120141 + Order + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-27 04:05:34 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + SapDB problem when displaying order task list assigned to user role + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 04:05:34 + SapDB problem when displaying order task list assigned to user role: +if more than one order is assigned to user role, in "Order List" page the +orders are shown 5 times! +If only one order is assigned to the user role, the order is shown well (1 +time). + +See picture attached. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 04:07:00 + Created an attachment (id=10) +Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times. + + + + image/gif + 10 + 2004-02-27 04:07:00 + Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times. + + order_list_bug.GIF + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/10/order_list_bug.GIF + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 04:07:00 + attachments.thedata + Attachment Data + + Created an attachment (id=10) +Bug example showing two orders waiting approval duplicated 5 times. + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:41 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 40 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20050209023003 + WorkEffort + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-27 07:27:15 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Party lookup with empty fields returns only one person repeated many times (= number of persons). + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 07:27:15 + If, in Party lookup, you perform a lookup with empty fields (all records), +returns only one person repeated many times (= number of persons). +I suspect that the problem is in the "lookupParty" simple method in common +component. + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:30:03 + Fixed changing the way the lookup is implemented (see Jira issue OFBIZ-114). + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:50 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:30:03 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2005-02-09 02:30:03 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 41 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120912 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-27 08:53:04 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility Manager: in Edit shipment -> items tab, a wrong link to EditProduct caused a controller error (same as issue #38) + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 08:53:04 + Facility Manager: in View shipment tab, a wrong link to EditProduct +page caused a controller error (same as issue #38). + +Patch for ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl file is attached. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 08:53:50 + Created an attachment (id=11) +Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:41:15 + Your changes are now in CVS. Thanks for sending those over Jacopo. + + + text/plain + 11 + 2004-02-27 08:53:50 + Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF + 1 + ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/11/ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-27 08:53:50 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=11) +Patch for file ViewShipmentItemInfo.ftl in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:41:15 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:41:15 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:09:12 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 42 + RESOLVED + P4 + WONTFIX + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630193328 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-28 22:34:42 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In shipment, the following error message appears: "Applet Package Weight Reader notinited" + + + jacopo + 2004-02-28 22:34:42 + In shipment, the following error message appears: "Applet Package Weight Reader +notinited". +I think the problem is caused by the fact that the class ShipmentScaleApplet is +not built in the ant task. +Was this done intentionally? (I think this applet tries to connect to a scale +device connected to a serial port and so probably this could cause some +problems...). + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:39:52 + reassigned; I will comment out the applet code until this is finished + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:33:28 + The applet is going to be replaced with a think client shipment station UI + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:39:52 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:01:59 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:33:28 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:33:28 + resolution + Resolution + + WONTFIX + + + + 43 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120921 + E-Commerce + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-02-28 22:46:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In "Create Return", select-all checkbox doesn't work due to wrong form name. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-28 22:46:49 + In "Create Return", select-all checkbox doesn't work due to wrong form name. + +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in Unified Output Format. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-28 22:47:40 + Created an attachment (id=12) +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF. + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:48:30 + Your changes are in CVS. Thanks for fixing that. + + + text/plain + 12 + 2004-02-28 22:47:39 + Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF. + 1 + requestreturn.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/12/requestreturn.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-02-28 22:47:40 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=12) +Patch attached for requestreturn.ftl in UOF. + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:48:30 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 07:48:30 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:09:21 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 44 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040229030013 + Product + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-02-29 03:00:13 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Packages: ShipmentPackage's weight automatically updated when ShipmentPackageContent entries are added/deleted (weight taken from the Product entity). + + + jacopo + 2004-02-29 03:00:13 + Packages: ShipmentPackage's weight automatically updated when +ShipmentPackageContent entries are added/deleted (weight taken from the Product +entity). + + + + 45 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040301155709 + Order + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-02-29 06:17:33 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In orderview page, if you select the "QuickShip order link" you get a controller error. + + + jacopo + 2004-02-29 06:17:33 + In orderview page (/ordermgr/control/orderview), if you select the "QuickShip +order link" you get a controller error: + +org.ofbiz.content.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request +[quickShipOrderMultiFacility]; this request does not exist or cannot be called +directly. + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 12:11:07 + I'll get on this... + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 15:57:09 + Changed the default behavior for this; also added request-map and service defs for the quick ship from +multi facilites. + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 12:11:07 + issue_status + Status + NEW + STARTED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 15:57:09 + issue_status + Status + STARTED + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-01 15:57:09 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 46 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040806152631 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-02 05:13:01 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Patch for multiple inventory facility reservation + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 05:13:01 + Patch for multiple inventory facility reservation: +the intent of this is to perform reservation only if all items are available in +one facility: that, I think, is the declared behaviour, and what is checked +with the isInventoryAvailable method. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 05:13:49 + Created an attachment (id=13) +Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 15:26:31 + Thanks Jacopo, your patch is now in CVS. + + + text/plain + 13 + 2004-03-02 05:13:49 + Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF + 1 + ProductStoreWorker.java.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/13/ProductStoreWorker.java.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 05:13:49 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=13) +Patch for ProductStoreWorker.java in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:02:10 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 15:26:31 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 15:26:31 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 47 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040323221326 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-02 06:06:51 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility -> Shipment: patch for JavaScript error introduced during i18n process. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 06:06:51 + Facility -> Shipment: patch for JavaScript error introduced during i18n process. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 06:07:51 + Created an attachment (id=14) +Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:42:45 + reassigned + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:13:26 + This bug has been fixed by the code for the new feature regarding shipment +plans. + + + text/plain + 14 + 2004-03-02 06:07:51 + Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF + 1 + AddItemsFromOrder.ftl.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/14/AddItemsFromOrder.ftl.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 06:07:51 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=14) +Patch for AddItemsFromOrder.ftl file in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:42:45 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:02:18 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:13:26 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:13:26 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 48 + NEW + P2 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120228 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-02 06:28:37 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility -> Shipment -> Items: delete shipment item link returns a constraint violation error. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-02 06:28:37 + Facility -> Shipment -> Items: delete shipment item link returns a constraint +violation error: + +The following errors occurred: +ERROR: Could not complete the Delete ShipmentItem process [problem removing the +lookedUpValue value: Exception while deleting the following entity: +[GenericEntity:ShipmentItem][shipmentId,10010(java.lang.String)] +[shipmentItemSeqId,00001(java.lang.String)] (SQL Exception while executing the +following:DELETE FROM SHIPMENT_ITEM WHERE SHIPMENT_ID=? AND +SHIPMENT_ITEM_SEQ_ID=? (Integrity constraint violation ITEM_ISS_SHITM table: +ITEM_ISSUANCE in statement [DELETE FROM SHIPMENT_ITEM WHERE SHIPMENT_ID=? AND +SHIPMENT_ITEM_SEQ_ID=?]))] + +In my opinion, the delete shipment item link should perform something like this +(instead of barely trying to remove the ShipmentItem entry): it should remove +the item issuances, recreate the reservations and then remove the shipment item. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:02:28 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 49 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040528001027 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-03 03:11:18 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same shipment items. This is a partial patch for this problem. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-03 03:11:18 + Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same +shipment items. This is a partial patch for this problem. With the attached +patch the shipment already delivered (or cancelled) are not shown (and so the +user cannot receive them again). +In order to completely fix this issue the best solution is, in my opinion, to +automatically update the shipment status to "delivered" when the user receives +an item: this could be done modifying the service +group "receiveInventoryProduct" by adding to it the "updateShipment" service +(to update the shipment status). However I'm going to add this comments to a +new "DEFECT" issue. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-03 03:12:11 + Created an attachment (id=15) +Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF. + + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 00:10:27 + This is now in CVS, thanks for sending it over Jacopo. + + + text/plain + 15 + 2004-03-03 03:12:11 + Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF. + 1 + receiveInventory.bsh.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/15/receiveInventory.bsh.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-03-03 03:12:11 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=15) +Patch for file receiveInventory.bsh in UOF. + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:02:37 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 00:10:27 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 00:10:27 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 50 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040528000924 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-03 03:15:23 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same shipment items. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-03 03:15:24 + Facility -> Receive PO: at now it's possible to receive multiple times the same +shipment items. +This problem was partially fixed by the patch attached to issue #49. +With that patch the shipment already delivered (or cancelled) are not shown +(and so the user cannot receive them again). +In order to completely fix this issue the best solution is, in my opinion, to +automatically update the shipment status to "delivered" when the user receives +an item: this could be done modifying the service +group "receiveInventoryProduct" by adding to it the "updateShipment" service +(to update the shipment status). However I'm going to add this comments to a +new "DEFECT" issue. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 00:09:24 + The patch is in, now just need to update the shipment status as mentioned in the description. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:02:49 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 51 + RESOLVED + P3 + REMIND + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040811004716 + Startup + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-03 06:37:30 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Several SapDB error messages are generated at startup when entities are created. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-03 06:37:30 + Several SapDB error messages are generated at startup when entities are created. +The messages appear during the indices' generation phase, not for all entities +(maybe 5-10%); here is an example: + +147042[ DatabaseUtil.java:319:ERROR] Could not create foreign key indices +for entity "EftAccount": SQL Exception while executing the following: +CREATE INDEX EFTACCT_PMETH ON EFT_ACCOUNT (PAYMENT_METHOD_ID) +Error was: com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.DatabaseException: [-7055] (at 44): +Column(s) already indexed:EFTACCT_PMETH +SQL Exception while executing the following: +CREATE INDEX EFTACCT_PADDR ON EFT_ACCOUNT (CONTACT_MECH_ID) +Error was: com.sap.dbtech.jdbc.exceptions.DatabaseException: [-7055] (at 44): +Column(s) already indexed:EFTACCT_PADDR + + + jacopo + 2004-08-11 00:47:16 + I've created a new issue (OFBIZ-1) for this in Jira; in it you will find a lot +of details. + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:00 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2004-08-11 00:47:16 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-08-11 00:47:16 + resolution + Resolution + + REMIND + + + + 52 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040308121509 + Order + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-04 03:14:08 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Billing accounts selectable by users during order entry are not correctly filtered out. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-04 03:14:08 + Billing accounts selectable by users as payment methods during order entry are +not correctly filtered out: removed billing accounts are also shown (i.e. +billing accounts with thru date < now). + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:15:09 + Billing accounts are now filtered by date so expired accounts no longer show on order manager order +entry and the ecommerce checkout pages + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:15:09 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:15:09 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 12:15:09 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 53 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040528010450 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-05 06:01:05 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In Shipment: it's possible to issue 0 quantities from AddItemsFormOrder page. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-05 06:01:05 + In Shipment: it's possible to issue 0 quantities from AddItemsFormOrder page +(an ItemIssuance record is created with 0 quantity). +I think this should be avoided by submitting only quantities > 0. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 01:04:50 + Now checks to see if quantity is empty or 0 when issuing OIIRs to the shipment. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:13 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 01:04:50 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-28 01:04:50 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 54 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040630124239 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-05 06:20:02 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In Shipment: if you enter a non numeric value (such as null quantity) in the issue field the program returns a bad error. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-05 06:20:02 + In Shipment: if you enter a non numeric value (such as null quantity) in the +issue field the program returns a bad error. +See also issue#53. +I'm running SapDB and after this error I need to restart OFBiz because in every +page I receive SQL errors like the following: + +Target exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException: SQL Exception +occurred on commit (Cannot commit a transactional connection: See JDBC 2.0 +Optional Package Specification section 7.1 (p25)) +BSF info: ..\ofbiz\components\content\webapp\content\WEB- +INF\actions\includes\envsetup.bsh at line: 0 column: 0) + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 12:42:39 + Applied patch which fixes a bug in the service multi event handler + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:23 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 12:42:39 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 12:42:39 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 55 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040323221851 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-05 06:25:34 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' quantity on hand can be negative. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-05 06:25:34 + I've noticed that, in shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with +negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory +items' quantity on hand can be negative. +In my opinion, in this situation at least a warning message should be +provided. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:18:51 + In "Order Items" page a new column has been added that tells users if they are +issuing negative reservations and the default issuance value is also +decremented by this quantity. +However is still possible to override this value and force an issuance for a +negative reservation. + + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:32 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:18:51 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-03-23 22:18:51 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 56 + RESOLVED + P3 + WONTFIX + Components + CVS + PC + issues@ofbiz + 20040308173638 + Party + vivalinux + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-08 14:07:32 + issues@ofbiz + + http://<ofbiz_root_url>/partymgr/control/findparty + + All + Selecting "Show All Records" displays all names as "(Not selected)" + + + vivalinux + 2004-03-08 14:07:32 + The findparty.bsh constructs a dynamic view tailored to the search fields +submited by the lookupparty form. Since selecting all does not give a hint about +which fields the client is interested in, the findparty.bsh fails to include any +of the name (firstName, lastName, groupName) fields. + +The can be corrected with the patch that follows or handling the select all +records as yet another case. I think, I'll side with simplicity, and sacrify +efficiency .... + +Hope this helps. + + +Index: components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh +=================================================================== +RCS file: +/cvs/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh,v +retrieving revision 1.13 +diff -u -r1.13 findparty.bsh +--- components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh 27 Jan +2004 19:44:36 -0000 1.13 ++++ components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/findparty.bsh 8 Mar +2004 22:06:24 -0000 +@@ -100,8 +100,15 @@ + + // default view settings + dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PT", "Party"); ++ dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PG", "PartyGroup"); ++ dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PP", "Person"); + dynamicView.addAlias("PT", "partyId"); + dynamicView.addAlias("PT", "partyTypeId"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PG", "groupName"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PP", "firstName"); ++ dynamicView.addAlias("PP", "lastName"); ++ dynamicView.addViewLink("PT","PG",true,UtilMisc.toList(new +ModelKeyMap("partyId", "partyId"))); ++ dynamicView.addViewLink("PT","PP",true,UtilMisc.toList(new +ModelKeyMap("partyId", "partyId"))); + dynamicView.addRelation("one-nofk", "", "PartyType", +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyTypeId")); + dynamicView.addRelation("many", "", "UserLogin", +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); + +@@ -143,11 +150,6 @@ + if (groupName != null && groupName.length() > 0) { + paramList = paramList + "&groupName=" + groupName; + +- // modify the dynamic view +- dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PG", "PartyGroup"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PG", "groupName"); +- dynamicView.addViewLink("PT", "PG", Boolean.FALSE, +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); +- + // add the expr + andExprs.add(new EntityExpr("groupName", true, EntityOperator.LIKE, +"%"+groupName+"%", true)); + } +@@ -160,14 +162,6 @@ + firstName = request.getParameter("firstName"); + lastName = request.getParameter("lastName"); + +- // modify the dynamic view +- if ((firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) || (lastName != null && +lastName.length() > 0)) { +- dynamicView.addMemberEntity("PE", "Person"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PE", "firstName"); +- dynamicView.addAlias("PE", "lastName"); +- dynamicView.addViewLink("PT", "PE", Boolean.FALSE, +ModelKeyMap.makeKeyMapList("partyId")); +- } +- + // filter on firstName + if (firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) { + paramList = paramList + "&firstName=" + firstName; +@@ -319,6 +313,12 @@ + List orderBy = new ArrayList(); + fieldsToSelect.add("partyId"); + fieldsToSelect.add("partyTypeId"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("firstName"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("lastName"); ++ fieldsToSelect.add("groupName"); ++ orderBy.add("-partyTypeId"); ++ orderBy.add("lastName"); ++ orderBy.add("groupName"); + + // UserLogin + if (userLoginId != null && userLoginId.length() > 0) { +@@ -327,14 +327,11 @@ + + // Person + if ((firstName != null && firstName.length() > 0) || (lastName != null +&& lastName.length() > 0)) { +- fieldsToSelect.add("firstName"); +- fieldsToSelect.add("lastName"); + orderBy.add("lastName"); + orderBy.add("firstName"); + } + // PartyGroup + if (groupName != null && groupName.length() > 0) { +- fieldsToSelect.add("groupName"); + orderBy.add("groupName"); + } + // RoleType +Index: components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl,v +retrieving revision 1.10 +diff -u -r1.10 findparty.ftl +--- components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl 1 Mar 2004 14:43:27 +-0000 1.10 ++++ components/party/webapp/partymgr/party/findparty.ftl 8 Mar 2004 22:06:24 -0000 +@@ -212,13 +212,12 @@ + </table> + <input type="image" src="/images/spacer.gif" +onClick="javascript:document.lookupparty.submit();"> + </form> +-<#if requestParameters.hideFields?default("N") != "Y"> + <script language="JavaScript"> + <!--// + document.lookupparty.partyId.focus(); + //--> + </script> +-</#if> ++ + <#if partyList?exists> + <br> + <table border=0 width='100%' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0' +class='boxoutside'> +@@ -292,21 +291,13 @@ + </td> + <td> + <div class="tabletext"> +- <#if partyRow.containsKey("lastName")> + <#if partyRow.lastName?has_content> + ${partyRow.lastName}<#if +partyRow.firstName?has_content>, ${partyRow.firstName}</#if> +- <#else> +- (No Name Found) +- </#if> +- <#elseif partyRow.containsKey("groupName")> +- <#if partyRow.groupName?has_content> ++ <#elseif partyRow.groupName?has_content> + ${partyRow.groupName} + <#else> +- (No Name Found) ++ (Not Selected) + </#if> +- <#else> +- (Not Selected) +- </#if> + </td> + <#if extInfo?default("") == "P"> + <td><div +class="tabletext">${partyRow.postalCode?if_exists}</div></td> + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:36:38 + This page has been changed from using the left joins in the dynamic view. Using left joins performs too +poorly for actual use. This patch has been rejected; a new task will be opened for fixing the problem of +the name not being displayed. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:36:38 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:36:38 + resolution + Resolution + + WONTFIX + + + + 57 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040308174641 + Party + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-08 17:36:18 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Find Party - Show all does not show name + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:36:18 + The name is not displayed when selecting show all in the party manager. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:46:41 + reassigned + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-08 17:46:41 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + + 58 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040308185722 + Content + vivalinux + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-08 18:57:22 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Inherited hidden fields overide child fields when they have use-when + + + vivalinux + 2004-03-08 18:57:22 + In working with inherited forms I noticed that hidden fields are hard +to override if the overriding field has a use-when attribute: + + Since the HtmlFormRenderer gives precedence to hidden fields, and new +fields with "use-when" are only placed in front of existing fields +but not merged with, the resulting behavior is that hidden fields of +parent forms always get rendered even when the use-when condition is +true. This causes the hidden field to take precedence over the user +input when the form is submitted. + + Here is a posible solution: + +Index: components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +=================================================================== +RCS file: +/usr/local/cvsrepos/newriverbiz/components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java,v +retrieving revision 1.1.1.4 +diff -u -r1.1.1.4 ModelForm.java +--- components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +2004/01/08 14:19:55 1.1.1.4 ++++ components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelForm.java +2004/01/29 20:23:20 +@@ -277,15 +277,25 @@ + public ModelFormField addUpdateField(ModelFormField modelFormField) { + if (!modelFormField.isUseWhenEmpty()) { + // is a conditional field, add to the List but don't worry about +the Map +- //for adding to list, see if there is another field with that name +in the list and if so, put it before that one ++ //for adding to list, see if there is another field with that name ++ //in the list and if so, put it before that one + boolean inserted = false; + for (int i = 0; i < this.fieldList.size(); i++) { + ModelFormField curField = (ModelFormField) this.fieldList.get(i); ++ // BUG FIX: parent hidden fields are left and rendered even when they ++ // are overriden with fields that have a use-when + if (curField.getName() != null && +curField.getName().equals(modelFormField.getName())) { +- this.fieldList.add(i, modelFormField); +- inserted = true; +- break; ++ if ((curField.getFieldInfo().getFieldType() != +ModelFormField.FieldInfo.HIDDEN) && ++ (curField.getFieldInfo().getFieldType() != ModelFormField.FieldInfo.IGNORED)) { ++ this.fieldList.add(i, modelFormField); ++ inserted = true; ++ break; ++ } else { ++ curField.mergeOverrideModelFormField(modelFormField); ++ break; ++ } + } ++ //End of BUG fix + } + if (!inserted) { + this.fieldList.add(modelFormField); + + + + 59 + NEW + P1 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040318120354 + Workflow + mbennani + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-09 06:47:17 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Serious Problem in Sub-flow Implementation: in-Memory Requester Used!! + + + mbennani + 2004-03-09 06:47:17 + I am running ofbiz almost v.3 :-) (image from late 2003 from cvs). +(subflow implementation did not change since 1.2 anyways, I believe) + +Quick Description: +------------------ +Subflows are using the in-memory requester object which +does not persist over server re-starts. This is serious one guys. + +More Description (Scenario): +--------------------------- +I have a main process with 3 steps(step1,step2-subflow,step3). A subflow +process being the second step. This second step calls another process that I +call sub. sub has 2 simple steps (substep1,substep2). + +Now, in normal time (i.e no server restart), it all works fine and my main +process runs fine, calls the subflow, subflow runs, the call returns and my +step3 of the main process runs successfully and main completes fine. + +The problem arises when say I run step 1 of main process, subflow gets +initiated, substep1 is executed, and before substep2 is executed, I stop the +server (faking a server problem..., connection lost...whatever). +When I restart the server, the subflow resumes at substep2 which executes fine, +and eventually completes the subflow process. But, step-subflow activity in the +workeffort table still shows WF_RUNNING. Therefore, my main process is hanging +there and will never move along. The waitForResult() is not executed anymore +after server restart. +This is happening in WfActivitySubFlowImplementation on runService. + +Even More Details, code wise, if you want to look at it: +------------------------------------------------------- +In a normal scenario (no server stopped), the runService of +WfActivitySubFlowImplementation eventually calls the runSync in WorkflowEngine +and then waitForResult. I put a system out message in the waiter class and I +can see my message being displayed in the console forever ("waiting..."), until +the subflow process finishes. And that's ok, that's what we want. When the +subflow process finishes, the call is returned back to the runService in +WfActivitySubFlowImplementation() and the setComplete is called, which changes +the status of my step2-subflow activity in the main process to WF_COMPLETED to +advance the main process. It also calls setResults() to propagate the results +from the subflow up to the main process. + +BUT, now if I stop my server during that wait, and restart it the call never +reachs the setComplete nor the setResults, making therefore my main process +unusable anymore. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:54 + op_sys + OS/Version + Windows 2000 + All + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:03:54 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + + 60 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707152609 + Entity + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 07:09:04 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Replace simplistic caching with complex reverse dependency resolver + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:09:04 + This patch removes all simple caching from GenericDelegator, and replaces +it with a stand-alone class, that handles all entity cache management. It +uses new features in the entity model, that keeps track of view entities +that are referenced by regular entities. As entities are updated, all +cached lists of views or condition caches are cleared. + +With this patch applied, view entities can be cached, without worry that +they will become stale. Which then allows very complex views to be +created, that emulate complex code patterns, while still allowing for +caching. This can speed up code tremendously. + +Additionally, since cache clearing now works, it almost always makes more +sense to use the cache variation of the methods. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:14:24 + Created an attachment (id=16) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 15:44:46 + This patch is on hold, until some other patches are committed. Some of them +need to have bugs filed, which I am working on. Plus, this patch needs to be +updated to the latest code base(not a big task, done locally). + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 15:26:09 + This is now in cvs. + + + text/plain + 16 + 2004-03-09 07:14:24 + The patch + 1 + EntityCache.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/16/EntityCache.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:14:24 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=16) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 15:44:46 + issue_status + Status + NEW + STARTED + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:01 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 15:26:09 + issue_status + Status + STARTED + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 15:26:09 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 61 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422222023 + Product + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:18:26 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow for easier extension of this class. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:18:26 + This patch makes a protected writeValues() method, which allows sub-classes +to redirect the output to other places, as needed. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:18:49 + Created an attachment (id=17) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:20:23 + Applied the patch. + + + text/plain + 17 + 2004-03-09 07:18:49 + The patch + 1 + EntitySaxReader-extension.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/17/EntitySaxReader-extension.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:18:49 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=17) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:20:23 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:20:23 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 62 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422223418 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:34:07 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow for UPPER() and LOWER() sorting + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:34:07 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:34:26 + Created an attachment (id=18) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:34:18 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 18 + 2004-03-09 07:34:26 + The patch. + 1 + EntityUtil-UPPER_LOWER.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/18/EntityUtil-UPPER_LOWER.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:34:26 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=18) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:34:18 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:34:18 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 63 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429160209 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:36:19 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add support for turning off schemas completely + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:36:19 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:36:42 + Created an attachment (id=19) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:02:09 + Applied this patch. + + + text/plain + 19 + 2004-03-09 07:36:42 + The patch + 1 + use-schemas.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/19/use-schemas.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:36:42 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=19) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:02:09 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:02:09 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 64 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422222810 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:43:55 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Make the code look like the rest of the file. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:43:55 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:44:21 + Created an attachment (id=20) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:28:10 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 20 + 2004-03-09 07:44:21 + The patch + 1 + SqlJdbcUtil-Cast.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/20/SqlJdbcUtil-Cast.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:44:21 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=20) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:28:10 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:28:10 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 65 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429163146 + Entity + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 07:46:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add java.util.Date support. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:46:14 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:46:39 + Created an attachment (id=21) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:31:46 + Applied the patch. + + + text/plain + 21 + 2004-03-09 07:46:39 + The patch + 1 + SqlJdbcUtil-Java_Util_Date.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/21/SqlJdbcUtil-Java_Util_Date.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:46:39 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=21) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:03 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:31:45 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:31:45 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 66 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422221943 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:47:46 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Use UtilValidate.isNotEmpty. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:47:46 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:48:06 + Created an attachment (id=22) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:19:43 + Applied patch, which uses UtilValidate.isNotEmpty in SqlJdbcUtil. + + + text/plain + 22 + 2004-03-09 07:48:06 + The patch + 1 + SqlJdbcUtil-UtilValidate.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/22/SqlJdbcUtil-UtilValidate.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:48:06 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=22) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:19:43 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:19:43 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 67 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429161604 + Entity + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 07:49:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add support for <constraint> on relations and views. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:49:20 + When defining a view or relation, you can now constrain the returned +values to those that match an EntityCondition. This is really helpful +for complex views. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:49:42 + Created an attachment (id=23) +The patch + + + + text/plain + 23 + 2004-03-09 07:49:42 + The patch + 1 + model-constraint.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/23/model-constraint.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:49:42 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=23) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:04 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + + 68 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040423074926 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:51:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Use a NumberFormat for casting number objects to strings. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:51:20 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:51:40 + Created an attachment (id=24) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:49:26 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 24 + 2004-03-09 07:51:40 + The patch + 1 + GenericEntity-NumberFormat.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/24/GenericEntity-NumberFormat.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:51:40 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=24) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:49:26 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:49:26 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 69 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040423075223 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 07:52:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add addToXmlElement method + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:52:20 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:52:42 + Created an attachment (id=25) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:52:23 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 25 + 2004-03-09 07:52:42 + The patch + 1 + GenericEntity-addToXmlElement.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/25/GenericEntity-addToXmlElement.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:52:42 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=25) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:52:23 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 07:52:23 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 70 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422221512 + Entity + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-09 07:54:40 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fix modelEntity dereferencing + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:54:40 + When GenericEntities have been deserialized, modelEntity will be null. +getModelEntity() should be called, to repopulate it. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:54:57 + Created an attachment (id=26) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:15:12 + Applied patch, plus fixed it in a few other areas. + + + text/plain + 26 + 2004-03-09 07:54:57 + The patch + 1 + GenericEntity-getModelEntity.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/26/GenericEntity-getModelEntity.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:54:57 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=26) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:15:12 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:15:12 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 71 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501214447 + Content + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 07:56:46 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Factor out the code + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:56:46 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:57:40 + Created an attachment (id=27) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:06:43 + Not adding this patch, breaks the Server Stats Since Start page in WebTools, and not totally sure the +cleanup is worth it yet. + + + doogie + 2004-05-01 21:44:47 + I'll fix that page then, and submit a revised patch. + + + text/plain + 27 + 2004-03-09 07:57:40 + The patch. + 1 + ServerHitBin-factor.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/27/ServerHitBin-factor.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 07:57:40 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=27) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:02 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:07:05 + priority + Priority + P2 + P4 + + + + 72 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422223139 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 08:04:05 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add a matches(condition) helper method. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:04:05 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:04:31 + Created an attachment (id=28) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:31:39 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 28 + 2004-03-09 08:04:31 + The patch + 1 + GenericEntity-matches-condition.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/28/GenericEntity-matches-condition.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:04:31 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=28) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:31:39 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:31:39 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 73 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422221835 + Entity + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-09 08:05:30 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fix deserializing of these objects. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:05:30 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:05:51 + Created an attachment (id=29) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:18:35 + Applied patch, which set delegatorName to "default" when it is null. + + + text/plain + 29 + 2004-03-09 08:05:50 + The patch. + 1 + GenericDelegator-fix-serialization.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/29/GenericDelegator-fix-serialization.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:05:51 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=29) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:18:35 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:18:35 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 74 + NEW + P2 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429200642 + Order + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:08:00 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fix all fetchers of shopping cart to use a static method + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:08:00 + This patch fixes all code that fetches the ShoppingCart from the session, +to use a static method instead. It also adds the beginning of named +ShoppingCart support. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:08:22 + Created an attachment (id=30) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:05:04 + This patch depends on EntityCache, which isn't ready for inclussion yet, +reducing priority. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:06:42 + Oops, modified wrong issue. + + + text/plain + 30 + 2004-03-09 08:08:22 + The patch. + 1 + ShoppingCart-getShoppingCart.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/30/ShoppingCart-getShoppingCart.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:08:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=30) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:03 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:05:04 + priority + Priority + P2 + P3 + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:06:41 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + + 75 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429171641 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:09:21 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow code to detect whether a cacheline has expired. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:09:21 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:09:41 + Created an attachment (id=31) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:41 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 31 + 2004-03-09 08:09:41 + The patch + 1 + UtilCache-hasExpired.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/31/UtilCache-hasExpired.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:09:41 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=31) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:04 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:41 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:41 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 76 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429171643 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:10:31 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow code to get the values stored in the cache. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:10:31 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:10:58 + Created an attachment (id=32) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:43 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 32 + 2004-03-09 08:10:58 + The patch + 1 + UtilCache-getCacheLineValues.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/32/UtilCache-getCacheLineValues.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:10:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=32) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:05 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:43 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:43 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 77 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429171648 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:11:52 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow registering of listeners for the various events on caches. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:11:52 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:12:13 + Created an attachment (id=33) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:48 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 33 + 2004-03-09 08:12:12 + The patch + 1 + UtilCache-listeners.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/33/UtilCache-listeners.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:12:13 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=33) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:05 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:48 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:16:48 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 78 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040423080723 + Entity + doogie + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-09 08:19:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Some additional methods to manipulate the embedded cache. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:19:59 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:20:20 + Created an attachment (id=34) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 08:07:23 + Add some more methods to GenericValue to manipulate the cache. + + + text/plain + 34 + 2004-03-09 08:20:20 + The patch + 1 + GenericValue-EmbeddedCache.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/34/GenericValue-EmbeddedCache.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:20:20 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=34) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 08:07:23 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-23 08:07:23 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 79 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429200727 + Product + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:21:27 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + methods to fetch the list of available catalogs. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:21:27 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:21:46 + Created an attachment (id=35) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:07:27 + This patch depends on EntityCache, which isn't ready for inclussion yet, +reducing priority. + + + text/plain + 35 + 2004-03-09 08:21:46 + The patch + 1 + CatalogWorker-getCatalogsAvailable.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/35/CatalogWorker-getCatalogsAvailable.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:21:46 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=35) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:05 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 20:07:27 + priority + Priority + P2 + P3 + + + + 80 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422222535 + Entity + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-09 08:22:53 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Create a separate makeIndexName helper method. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:22:53 + This patch also truncates the index name, based on the clipping value. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:23:14 + Created an attachment (id=36) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:25:35 + Applied patch. + + + text/plain + 36 + 2004-03-09 08:23:14 + The patch + 1 + DatabaseUtil-makeIndexName.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/36/DatabaseUtil-makeIndexName.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:23:14 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=36) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:25:35 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + doogie + 2004-04-22 22:25:35 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 81 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429172408 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:23:52 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add support for writing elements. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:23:52 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:24:13 + Created an attachment (id=37) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:08 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 37 + 2004-03-09 08:24:12 + The patch + 1 + UtilXml-writeElement.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/37/UtilXml-writeElement.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:24:13 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=37) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:03 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:08 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:08 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 82 + NEW + P2 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429195752 + Party + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 08:25:06 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Services/etc for manipulating PartyAttributes. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:25:06 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:25:27 + Created an attachment (id=38) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + text/plain + 38 + 2004-03-09 08:25:27 + The patch + 1 + PartyAttributes.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/38/PartyAttributes.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-09 08:25:27 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=38) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:16:04 + issue_type + Issue Type + FEATURE + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + + 83 + NEW + P5 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040309095844 + Content + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-09 09:58:44 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Problems displaying the Euro symbol in order confirmation by email with MS Outlook + + + jacopo + 2004-03-09 09:58:44 + Problems displaying the Euro symbol in order confirmation by email with MS +Outlook: instead of the beautyful Euro symbol you see a '?'. +Ok, maybe I should create an issue to the Microsoft issue tracker... however +I've reported this for two reasons: +1) other users reported this some time ago in the mailing lists +2) maybe, in general, for the currency symbols in ftl templates we should use +the html entity references (i.e. &euro; for the Euro symbol): this will solve +all the display problems with virtually any client software. + + + + 84 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040309101202 + Product + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-09 10:12:02 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' quantity on hand can be negative. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-09 10:12:02 + In shipment, it's possible to issue to shipment items with negative +reservations (atp < 0); as a consequence of this, also the inventory items' +quantity on hand can be negative. +In fact, when the issuance is performed, the (negative) reservation is deleted +and a new issuance is created and the inventory's qoh is decremented. +In my opinion, in this situation a warning message should be provided. +Also, David Jones has suggested to create a report of all negative QOH +InventoryItems and add a link for each one to get a physical inventory variance +started. + + + + 85 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730212116 + Party + jonesde + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-03-11 08:14:35 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + The showvisits page in the Party Manager is very slow when there are many visits + + + jonesde + 2004-03-11 08:14:35 + The showvisits page is not coded to efficiently display a subset of the visits when there are many active. +When there are tens of thousands the current code doesn't work very efficiently. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 21:21:16 + The code for visit display utilized the entity list iterator and pulls a subset for each page. The query +fields are indexed (as of now) so depending on the JDBC driver being used this should be quite efficient. +If you experience further problems, send more information to the DEV list. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:04 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 21:21:16 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 21:21:16 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 86 + NEW + P4 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040312164734 + Content + jonesde + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-12 16:45:26 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Error Message (esp Map) Improvements from Quake Wang + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 16:45:26 + A description from an email from Quake: + +================================ +David, + The attachment is my patch. The main changes are: + +1. Now the event and the service invoke will use the same message fields in SimpleMethod. +2. Add the errorMessageMap and successMessageMap for the message handling + + I only change the envsetup.bsh and errormsg.ftl in the ecommerce component, please use the +ecommerce to review the backward compatiblity. + +Regards +Quake +============================= + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 16:47:34 + Created an attachment (id=39) +Error Message patch from Quake Wang + + + + text/plain + 39 + 2004-03-12 16:47:34 + Error Message patch from Quake Wang + 1 + quake.errormessages.patch + 3 + jonesde + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/39/quake.errormessages.patch + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 16:47:34 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=39) +Error Message patch from Quake Wang + + + + + 87 + NEW + P3 + + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040312165745 + Base + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-12 16:56:52 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + bsf.jar in base is old + + + doogie + 2004-03-12 16:56:52 + bsf is no longer part of IBM. Instead, it has moved to jakarta. + +Attached patch changes imports, etc. It can't change the bsf.jar in +base/lib/scripting/, however. + + + doogie + 2004-03-12 16:57:45 + Created an attachment (id=40) +The patch. + + + + text/plain + 40 + 2004-03-12 16:57:45 + The patch. + 1 + IBM-Jakarta-BSF.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/40/IBM-Jakarta-BSF.patch + + + doogie + 2004-03-12 16:57:45 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=40) +The patch. + + + + + 88 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040312165737 + Order + jonesde + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-12 16:57:37 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Promotion/other adjustments not as expected when cancelling order items + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 16:57:37 + When order items are cancelled some order level adjustments are not changed, like order level +promotion adjustments. Because of this order totals can easily become negative. The question is what +to do about it? + +Andy wrote this at one point in an email: + +============================ +I was aware of this; the only order level adjustments which are currently re-calculated are shipping and +tax, order level promotions are not done at this time so we will need to add this in. In order to do this +promotion evaluation will need to be able to be done without a shopping cart. +============================ + +I'm not sure I totally agree with this, I think short of that it would still be good to at least pro-rate these +order adjustments like we do with tax and shipping. + +Or would it be better on any order change to just cancel the order and create a new one with full re- +calculations, including promotions, tax, shipping, etc, etc? If that is done should we apply promotions, +etc as if it was the original order date, or using today's date? (could be a big difference based on +promotions that come and go over time) + + + + 89 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040312171315 + Product + jonesde + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-12 17:10:18 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In product detail show variant prices (from Brian Johnson) + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 17:10:18 + Here is a description from an email from Brian Johnson: + +=================================== +I've changed productdetail to better handle variants with different prices. When you first bring-up the +page it says "make selections", then when you select the features from the drop-downs it'll show the +price for the product with those features. +-- +Brian Johnson +=================================== + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 17:13:15 + Created an attachment (id=41) +Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson + + + + text/plain + 41 + 2004-03-12 17:13:15 + Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson + 1 + productdetail-variantprices.patch + 3 + jonesde + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/41/productdetail-variantprices.patch + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 17:11:11 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + PATCH + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 17:13:15 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=41) +Show prices for variants along with drop down, patch from Brian Johnson + + + + + 90 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040312172159 + E-Commerce + jonesde + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-12 17:21:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Web/order/etc marketing reports like Core Metrics + + + jonesde + 2004-03-12 17:21:59 + The feature here is to create a standard set of reports commonly used to keep tabs on a web content +and/or ecommerce site. These reports would be similar to what a company like Core Metrics offers. + +Would include reports for a given time period such as for things like hits, visits/sessions, orders, +tracking codes, percent of customers that order, orders per customer, pages/products/etc viewed, +searches done, referring sites & search strings, etc, etc, etc. + + + + 91 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040315011245 + Product + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-15 01:12:45 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Shipment: potential problem when issuing negative reservations (quantityNotAvailable could be lost) + + + jacopo + 2004-03-15 01:12:45 + This is a potential problem when you issue negative reservation to a shipment. +Here is the scenario: + +1) inventory item 9000 for product WG-1111 with atp/qoh = 10/10 +2) two orders are received for WG-1111: the first for 8 items, the second +for 5 items +3) two reservations are made: the first for 8 items and the second for 5 +items but with quantityNotAvailable = 3 +4) the inventory item 9000 is now: atp/qoh = -3/10 +5) only the second order is issued to shipment: the reservation record is +deleted and the qoh is decremented +6) the inventory item 9000 is now: atp/qoh = -3/5 but the reservation for +the first order (for quantity = 8) has quantityNotAvailable = 0 (ERROR: it +should be 3) + +A possible patch: if we issue a negative reservation we should try to assign +the quantityNotAvailable to another reservation in the same inventory item. + +In order to do this, David Jones has proposed to do a re-reservation whenever a +reservation is issued to a shipment, considering that (like in this scenario) +shipments may occur in a different order than reservations. + +In fact, when new inventory is received a re-reservation is already done for +all OIIR that are associated to inventory items (of the same product) that have +negative ATP. +In a similar way, when we issue a OIIR, we could do a re-reservation for all +the OIIR associated to the inventory item. + + + + 92 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040416115022 + E-Commerce + holivier + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-16 06:35:41 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Simple Update for localization + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 06:35:41 + In the ecommerce component +2 UiLabels change (the # is now in the label) +and some french UiLabel correction + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 06:38:00 + Created an attachment (id=42) +the Ecommerce UiLabel patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:22 + Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier. + + + text/plain + 42 + 2004-03-16 06:38:00 + the Ecommerce UiLabel patch + 1 + EcommerceUiLabel.update.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/42/EcommerceUiLabel.update.patch + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 06:38:00 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=42) +the Ecommerce UiLabel patch + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:15 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:22 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:22 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 93 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040416115029 + Order + holivier + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-16 08:00:55 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Simple Update for localization + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 08:00:55 + Order component, some french UiLabels correction + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 08:02:07 + Created an attachment (id=43) +The OrderUilabel properties patch file + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:29 + Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier. + + + text/plain + 43 + 2004-03-16 08:02:07 + The OrderUilabel properties patch file + 1 + OrderUilabelCorrection.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/43/OrderUilabelCorrection.patch + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 08:02:07 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=43) +The OrderUilabel properties patch file + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:26 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:29 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:29 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 94 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040416115037 + Party + holivier + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-16 09:28:27 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Simple Update for localization + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:28:27 + simple french correction & translation in the Party and workeffort components + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:29:26 + Created an attachment (id=44) +the PartyUiLabel correction patch file + + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:30:03 + Created an attachment (id=45) +the workeffortUilabel correction patch file + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:37 + Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier. + + + text/plain + 44 + 2004-03-16 09:29:26 + the PartyUiLabel correction patch file + 1 + PartyUiLabelCorrection040316.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/44/PartyUiLabelCorrection040316.patch + + + text/plain + 45 + 2004-03-16 09:30:03 + the workeffortUilabel correction patch file + 1 + WorkeffortUiLabelCorrection040316.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/45/WorkeffortUiLabelCorrection040316.patch + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:29:26 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=44) +the PartyUiLabel correction patch file + + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:30:03 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=45) +the workeffortUilabel correction patch file + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:35 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:37 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:37 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 95 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040416115047 + Product + holivier + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-16 09:32:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Simple Update for localization + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:32:59 + Product components internationalization and the UiLabel files associated + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:36:08 + Created an attachment (id=46) +the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:47 + Patch is in CVS. Thanks for doing these Olivier. + + + text/plain + 46 + 2004-03-16 09:36:08 + the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties + 1 + ProductUiLabelMigration040316.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/46/ProductUiLabelMigration040316.patch + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 09:36:08 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=46) +the patch file for produt bsh, xml, ftl and properties + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:46 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:47 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-16 11:50:47 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 96 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jonesde + 20040730204543 + Security Extensions + holivier + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-16 13:30:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Typo error correction in emailPassword (bcc in place of cc) + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 13:30:49 + just a simple typo correction.In the emailPassword method when reading and +populated the service fields they was an error. + serviceContext.put("sendBcc", productStoreEmail.get("ccAddress")); +I have change cc to bcc + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 13:31:26 + Created an attachment (id=47) +the patch file + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:45:43 + this has already been fixed in cvs. + + + text/plain + 47 + 2004-03-16 13:31:26 + the patch file + 1 + EmailPassword040316.patch + 165 + holivier + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/47/EmailPassword040316.patch + + + holivier + 2004-03-16 13:31:26 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=47) +the patch file + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-03-18 12:04:54 + version + Version + Pre3.0.0 + CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:45:43 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:45:43 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 97 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040527234819 + Accounting + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-18 06:59:56 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Error when creating an invoice with billing account payment type. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-18 06:59:56 + The following error is generated when you try to create an invoice for an order +with payment type == billing account: + +---------------------------------------- +803495[ InvoiceServices.java:583:ERROR] Problems storing invoice items +org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Exception occurred in storeAll (while i +nserting: [GenericEntity:InvoiceContactMech][createdTxStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +156(java.sql.Timestamp)][invoiceId,10010(java.lang.String)][contactMechPurposeTy +peId,BILLING_LOCATION(java.lang.String)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +156(java.sql.Timestamp)][contactMechId,null()][createdStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46. +977(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2004-03-18 15:29:46.977(java.sql.Times +tamp)] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO INVOICE_CONTACT_ +MECH (INVOICE_ID, CONTACT_MECH_PURPOSE_TYPE_ID, CONTACT_MECH_ID, LAST_UPDATED_ST +AMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, + ?, ?, ?) ([-5005] (at 83): Missing non-NULL value))) +---------------------------------------- + +I think I've tracked down the source of this problem: +the field contactMechId for the billing account entry in BillingAccount entity +is empty. + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:12:53 + The error happens when no Billing Contact Mechanism is specified in the billing +account. +In order to fix this issue the input field "Billing Contact Mech" in the +EditBillingAccount page should be marked as mandatory. + + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:48:19 + Fixed by changing the code to not try to create that record when the BillingAccount.contactMechId is +empty. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:48:18 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:48:18 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 98 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040322173551 + Product + jacopo + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-03-19 07:41:21 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + New Shipment Plan feature for the shipment process. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-19 07:41:21 + New Shipment Plan feature for the shipment process. + +In order to support some of the tasks in the manufacturing industry there was +the need of some simple shipment planning functionality: we need to assign a +group of customer order items to a scheduled shipment (but without actually +picking and issuing the items from warehouse). + +The patches in the attached zip file add this functionality to the shipment ui. +This is the list of changes: + +NEW FILES (new page, within the shipment ui, for ShipmentPlan management) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.ftl +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.bsh +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/pagedefs/shipment/EditShipmentPlan.xml + +PATCHES +product/webapp/facility/shipment/ShipmentTabBar.ftl (added new link to +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/ShipmentForms.xml (some new forms for the +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/controller.xml (controller definitions for the +EditShipmentPlan page) + +product/webapp/facility/shipment/AddItemsFromOrder.ftl (added some info, also +fixed issues #47 and #55) +product/webapp/facility/WEB-INF/actions/shipment/AddItemsFromOrder.bsh (added +code to get reservations also from shipment plan) + +product/servicedef/services_shipment.xml (definitions for two new services to +add/delete entries in the Shipment Plan) +product/scripts/org/ofbiz/shipment/shipment/ShipmentSerices.xml (implementation +of the two new services) + +product/entitydef/entitygroup.xml (declaration of the new entity ShipmentPlan) +product/entitydef/entitymodel_shipment.xml (definition of the new entity +ShipmentPlan) + +product/config/ProductUiLabels.properties (some new labels) +product/config/ProductUiLabels_fr.properties (some new labels in ENGLISH) + + + jacopo + 2004-03-19 07:42:41 + Created an attachment (id=48) +The patches and new files + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-22 17:35:51 + This patch is now in place. Thanks for sending it in Jacopo. BTW, for future patches a consolidated +patch file is nice. + + + application/x-compressed + 48 + 2004-03-19 07:42:41 + The patches and new files + + ShipmentPlan.zip + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/48/ShipmentPlan.zip + + + jacopo + 2004-03-19 07:42:41 + attachments.thedata + Attachment Data + + Created an attachment (id=48) +The patches and new files + + + + jonesde + 2004-03-22 17:35:51 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-03-22 17:35:51 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 99 + RESOLVED + P4 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040806160304 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-03-28 01:13:10 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + New html report that shows inventory availability by product + + + jacopo + 2004-03-28 01:13:10 + This is a new html report (patches are in the attached zip file) for the +Facility Manager Application that shows info about stock levels and +reservations from a product point of view (instead of inventory item). +The action code is very simple (the bsh action calls a service to +compute atp and qoh per product); the report is formatted by the form widget +stuff. +It is not internationalized. +In my local setup I've added a link to it from the Inventory Item page but fell +free to modify it and put it where you want. + + + jacopo + 2004-03-28 01:14:46 + Created an attachment (id=49) +Files and patches for the new report. + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:03:04 + Okay, this is in CVS, and I added a link to it from the facility inventory items page. Thanks for sending +this over. + + + application/x-compressed + 49 + 2004-03-28 01:14:46 + Files and patches for the new report. + + inventory_report.zip + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/49/inventory_report.zip + + + jacopo + 2004-03-28 01:14:46 + attachments.thedata + Attachment Data + + Created an attachment (id=49) +Files and patches for the new report. + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:03:04 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-06 16:03:04 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 100 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + REL 3.0.0 + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040403232241 + E-Commerce + dlouzado + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-03-28 13:50:10 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + crash on Shipping Information page + + + dlouzado + 2004-03-28 13:50:10 + I was logged as "admin" user and buying something on the test store on ofbiz +instance running on a standalone machine (no connection with the internet). + +I was filling the shipping information and when I clicked 'continue' the +following exception was thrown: + + +"org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: JPublish execution error (BeanShell +script error: Sourced file: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +: Error in method invocation: Attempt to pass void argument (position 0) to +method: getContactMechByType : at Line: 65 : in file: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +: ContactHelper .getContactMechByType ( party , "EMAIL_ADDRESS" , false ) +BSF info: +C:\jtools\ofbiz\components\ecommerce\webapp\ecommerce\WEB-INF\actions\order\optionsettings.bsh +at line: 0 column: 0)" + + + jonesde + 2004-04-03 23:22:41 + Fixed so that "party" would exist where it is referenced there. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-03 23:22:41 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-03 23:22:41 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 101 + RESOLVED + P5 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040730152858 + Content + eckardjf + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-04-02 09:44:46 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + https Website Settings Ignored + + + eckardjf + 2004-04-02 09:44:46 + org.ofbiz.content.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest() checks to see if a request should be +secure, but is not - and will redirect to a secure url if necessary. However, when rewriting the url to +make it secure, it does not check the website settings for the enableHttps, httpsHost and httpsPort. It +uses the global defaults from url.properties instead, which means the website settings have no effect. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:28:58 + this has now been corrected in CVS. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:43:50 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:28:58 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:28:58 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 102 + NEW + P4 + + Components + REL 3.0.0 + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040403233556 + Entity Extensions + jonesde + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-03 23:35:56 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Easy way to disabling Entity Sync oriented information + + + jonesde + 2004-04-03 23:35:56 + Need an easy way to disable the saving of Entity Sync oriented information such as the entity remove +information. May not want to disable the auto tx and individual timestamps because they are used in +other code that takes advantage of the fact that they are always present (though we still need to get rid +of the last updated and created timestamps that were added to various entities). + + + + 103 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040405070601 + Accounting + bryce_nz + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-04-05 00:05:28 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Nasty little error in PaymentGatewayServices + + + bryce_nz + 2004-04-05 00:05:28 + In PaymentGatewayServices.refundPayment there is a section of code for creating +the payment for the refund, then at line 1255 there is the following: + + Map result = ServiceUtil.returnSuccess(); + result.put("paymentId", "10000"); + return result; + +Obviously the payment id being returned shouldn't be hardcoded in, should read: + + Map result = ServiceUtil.returnSuccess(); + result.put("paymentId", paymentId); + return result; + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 07:06:01 + This has been corrected in CVS, thank you. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 07:05:36 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 07:06:01 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 07:06:01 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 104 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405134511 + Workflow + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:22:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Job Definition + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:22:20 + This request might fit to the section "Service Engine Tools" on the page +"http://ofbiz.org/feature-list.html". + +Would you like to support the JDF +standard? +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_Definition_Format + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:45:11 + Not sure what this is supposed to be requesting. This issue contains no specific feature request. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:45:11 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:45:11 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 105 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405134741 + Service + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:28:41 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Support for dynamic Service Configuration + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:28:41 + Would you like to use a service configurator for your server? +- +http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-papers.html +- +http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jmx/tutorial/tutorialTOC.html + +Can this +request solved with JMX? +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Management_eXtensions + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:47:41 + This issue contains no specific feature request. Not sure what you are requesting, so there is no way to +determine if JMX will solve the problem. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:47:41 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:47:41 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 106 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405134845 + WebTools + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:42:12 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Portlet Interface + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:42:12 + Would you like to integrate components with web portals? + +- +http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2003/jw-0905-portlet2.html +- +http://www.javaworld.net/javaworld/jw-11-2003/jw-1114-jsfredux.html +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portlet + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:48:45 + Sure we would love to integrate with web portals, however this issue contains no specific feature +request. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:48:45 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:48:45 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 107 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405135106 + WebTools + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:47:12 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Vector graphics and XForms + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:47:12 + Will the application support .svgz or .x3dz files that contain XForms? + +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Vector_Graphics +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X3D +- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XForms +- +http://xml.apache.org/batik/ + +See also the request "XForms" in the discussion forum by +Britton LaRoche from "August 28, 2003 12:38:36 AM +GMT". +https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectForumMessageView?forumID=282&messageID=1065 + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:51:06 + This issue contains no specific feature request. No information was provided regarding how support for +these file types is desired and where the desired functionality is needed. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:51:06 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 13:51:06 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 108 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405140048 + Rules + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:51:31 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Integration with Knowledge Representation + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:51:31 + What is the current state of your support for this technology? +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_representation +- +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:00:48 + This issue is not a valid feature request, questions of this sort should be discussed on the mailing lists. +In addition, do expect readers to follow links and read articles to get your point across it is highly +unlikely that people will spent the time to research something for you. Your best bet is to read the +articles and post a question asking something specific, then your chances of getting an intelligent +response is greater. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:00:48 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:00:48 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 109 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405140138 + Service + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:52:57 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Open Services Gateway + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:52:57 + Would you like to cooperate with these service APIs so that your software can be used over these +interfaces? +http://www.osgi.org/about/faqs.asp +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:01:37 + This issue contains no specific feature request. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:01:37 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:01:37 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 110 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405140228 + Entity + elfring + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-05 13:56:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Content Storage API + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 13:56:20 + Would you like to support the programming interface "Content +Repository"? +http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 + +This topic can be perhaps combined +with requests for CVS and Subversion integration. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:02:28 + This issue contains no specific feature request; please see issue #108 for more suggestions. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:02:28 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:02:28 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 111 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405140305 + Workflow + elfring + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-05 14:02:16 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Workflow Management + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 14:02:17 + How do you think about workflow modelling patterns? +Which of them are supported by your +software? (Is cooperation with other standards like BPML besides WfMC XPDL +possible?) +http://tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/ + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:03:05 + see issue #108 + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:03:05 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:03:05 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 112 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040405141257 + Entity Extensions + elfring + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-05 14:07:40 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + relationships and object mapping + + + elfring + 2004-04-05 14:07:40 + I've got the impression from the discussion about the topic "entity-engine: thoughts on extends +(IS A) pattern and relationships" that there might be something useful from other information +sources. + +1. CORBA: Relationship Service +Specification +http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/relationship_service.htm + +2. +ObJectRelationalBridge +http://db.apache.org/ojb/ + +3. alternative open source +implementation for JDO +http://speedo.objectweb.org/ + +4. Citations from +CiteSeer +http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cis?q=object+and+relational+and+mapping+and+database + +5. +a detailed Wiki +http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_database + +Would you like to reuse +anything from those implementations and experiences? + +How does your use of the Java Open +Transaction Manager (http://jotm.objectweb.org/) fit into this picture? + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:12:57 + No specific enhancement requested. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:12:57 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-05 14:12:57 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 113 + RESOLVED + P3 + WORKSFORME + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040406101817 + WebTools + ajzeneski + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-04-06 07:00:29 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + EditEntity.jsp displays wrong field length + + + ajzeneski + 2004-04-06 07:00:29 + Reported by prozelit@yahoo.com: + +On EditEntity.jsp, there is a fields table. It is +supposed to display the length of each field, but it +looks like it displays the length of the field name +instead. It seems to me there is a bug at line 347. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-06 10:18:17 + +This is the expected behavior. The length in parenthesis there is meant to show you the length of the +column name so that you can tell if it is within the required length of the database, we generally +recommend (and always use) equal or less than 30 characters. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-06 10:18:17 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-06 10:18:17 + resolution + Resolution + + WORKSFORME + + + + 114 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + PC + issues@ofbiz + 20040406100126 + WorkEffort + vivalinux + not determined + PATCH + 2004-04-06 10:01:26 + issues@ofbiz + + http://<ofbiz_URL>/workeffort/control/month?start=1083297600000 + + All + Daylight savings and the calendar + + + vivalinux + 2004-04-06 10:01:26 + On the months when daylight savings takes place, or stops taking place +(April/September in the US), the way the start of the period is computed in the +WorkEffortServices.getWorkEffortsByPeriod yields one extra hour after dayligh +savings kicks in. +The reason for this is that the absolute time is interpreted differently once +daylight savings is in place. +So I suggest using the attached patch which relies on UtilDateTime.getDayStart +to get the period start/end. + + + + 115 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730150719 + Product + lykins + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-06 13:56:51 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Product to Order Lookup Link + + + lykins + 2004-04-06 13:56:51 + Something that should bring great benefit is the ability to link the product to +the orders from the product maintenance screen. It would be very beneficial to +know what purchase order the product came from. I noticed that there are links +to almost all other relations besides this. + +Thanks, +Patrick + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:07:19 + good idea; now in CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:07:19 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:07:19 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 116 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040417174533 + Product + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-04-17 00:19:59 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Implementation of getProductVariant service. + + + jacopo + 2004-04-17 00:19:59 + Implementation of getProductVariant service. + + + jacopo + 2004-04-17 00:20:48 + Created an attachment (id=50) +Patch for the java implementation + + + + jacopo + 2004-04-17 00:21:21 + Created an attachment (id=51) +Patch for the service definition. + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-17 17:45:33 + It's in. Thanks Jacopo. + + + text/plain + 50 + 2004-04-17 00:20:48 + Patch for the java implementation + 1 + ProductServices.java.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/50/ProductServices.java.patch + + + text/plain + 51 + 2004-04-17 00:21:21 + Patch for the service definition. + 1 + services.xml.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/51/services.xml.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-04-17 00:20:48 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=50) +Patch for the java implementation + + + + jacopo + 2004-04-17 00:21:21 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=51) +Patch for the service definition. + + + + jonesde + 2004-04-17 17:45:33 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-17 17:45:33 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 117 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040422201817 + Accounting + colt_nz + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-04-20 14:45:56 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + editPayment has wrongly named fields + + + colt_nz + 2004-04-20 14:45:56 + /accounting/webapp/accounting/payment/editPayment.ftl + +Input fields partyIdTo and partyIdFrom are round the wrong way. ie switch 'em. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-22 20:18:17 + +Thanks for reporting this, the fix is in CVS. Looks like it was perhaps an issue with the i18n... + + + jonesde + 2004-04-22 20:18:17 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-22 20:18:17 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 118 + RESOLVED + P4 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040819001212 + Product + jonesde + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-04-23 21:32:35 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Make QuickAddVariants Easier to Use + + + jonesde + 2004-04-23 21:32:35 + Make QuickAddVariants Easier to Use: + +1. Change to multi-form +2. Allow enter pattern to use to pre-populate the various IDs + + + jacopo + 2004-08-19 00:12:11 + Some time ago I did this and you put all the stuff in CVS, so now it's done. + + + jacopo + 2004-08-19 00:12:10 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-08-19 00:12:10 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 119 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jacopo + 20040717041328 + Manufacturing + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-24 00:15:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Refactoring of the BOMEvent class that manages all the related to bill of materials editing. + + + jacopo + 2004-04-24 00:15:36 + Refactoring of the BOMEvent class that manages all the related to bill of +materials editing. + +Three new (simple) services should be created (create, update, delete). +An sECA rule should be added to the create and update services to update the +low level code. + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:13:28 + Ok, the BOMEvent class has gone away; I have implemented some simple services +to add/update/remove/copy boms (performing all the needed checks for loops and +updating the product's llc). + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:13:28 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:13:28 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 120 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + jacopo + 20040424001903 + Manufacturing + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-24 00:19:03 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + searchDuplicateAncenstor service should resolve also virtual to variant products to search for loops. + + + jacopo + 2004-04-24 00:19:03 + searchDuplicateAncenstor service should resolve also virtual to variant +products to search for loops. + + + + 121 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jacopo + 20040717041557 + Manufacturing + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-24 00:24:11 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Refactoring of the Bill of Material editor's ui: migration to the forms widget. + + + jacopo + 2004-04-24 00:24:11 + Refactoring of the Bill of Material editor's ui: migration to the forms widget. + +This will also include: +- i18n and l10n issues +- management of all the relavant fields that are missing +- lookup fields +- fields validation + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:15:57 + I have not used the form widget (maybe in the future, together with some more +clean ups) here, but most of these points has been fixed. + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:15:57 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-17 04:15:57 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 122 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + jacopo + 20040424002537 + Manufacturing + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-24 00:25:37 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + updateLowLevelCode service - it should also update the low level code for variant products + + + jacopo + 2004-04-24 00:25:37 + updateLowLevelCode service - it should also update the low level code for +variant products + + + + 123 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501062848 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:05:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add methods to check against classes, instead of only objects. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:05:20 + This patch adds new versions of interfaceOf, isOrSubOf, and instanceOf, that +check against a class, instead of an Object. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:06:57 + Created an attachment (id=52) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:48 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 52 + 2004-04-29 16:06:57 + The patch. + 1 + ObjectType-check-against-class.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/52/ObjectType-check-against-class.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:06:57 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=52) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:15:14 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:52 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:48 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:48 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 124 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501062855 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:08:48 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Handle is-* operators when value1 is null + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:08:48 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:09:11 + Created an attachment (id=53) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:53 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:55 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 53 + 2004-04-29 16:09:11 + The patch + 1 + ObjectType-is-compare-value1-null.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/53/ObjectType-is-compare-value1-null.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:09:11 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=53) +The patch + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:15:14 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:53 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:55 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:28:55 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 125 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501062903 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:10:04 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Convert classnames to full names. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:10:04 + See $summary. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:10:21 + Created an attachment (id=54) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:48 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:29:03 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 54 + 2004-04-29 16:10:21 + The patch. + 1 + ObjectType-convert-classname-to-full.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/54/ObjectType-convert-classname-to-full.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:10:21 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=54) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:15:13 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:29:03 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:29:03 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 126 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501062243 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:13:25 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add some helper methods for objects implementing their own equals, compareTo, and hashCode + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:13:25 + Name: UtilObject.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add some helper methods for objects implementing their own equals, +compareTo, and hashCode. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilObject.java | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:13:45 + Created an attachment (id=55) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:43 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 55 + 2004-04-29 16:13:45 + The patch. + 1 + UtilObject.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/55/UtilObject.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:13:45 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=55) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:15:13 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:43 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:43 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 127 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501055554 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:18:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Simplify the top-level build.xml + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:18:14 + Name: simpler-build.xml.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Simplifies the top-level build.xml + This patch makes use of ant 1.6 features, to automate calling of sub + build.xmls. It also adds a 'test' target; note, however, that the + listed sub build.xmls don't actually have that test target yet. +DiffStat: + build.xml | 494 ++++---------------------------------------------------------- + 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 462 deletions(-) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:18:43 + Created an attachment (id=56) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:50 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:55:54 + This is now in, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 56 + 2004-04-29 16:18:43 + The patch. + 1 + simpler-build.xml.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/56/simpler-build.xml.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:18:43 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=56) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:19:44 + issue_type + Issue Type + DEFECT + ENHANCEMENT + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:50 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:55:54 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:55:54 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 128 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501051820 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:20:39 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add support for formatting time intervals with human words + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:20:39 + Name: UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add support for formatting time intervals with human words +DiffStat: + base/config/DateTimeLabels.properties | 10 ++ + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilDateTime.java | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++ + 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:20:57 + Created an attachment (id=57) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:18:20 + These are now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 57 + 2004-04-29 16:20:57 + The patch. + 1 + UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/57/UtilDateTime-time-interval.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:20:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=57) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:51 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:18:20 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:18:20 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 129 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429172414 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:22:10 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add more childElementList and firstChildElement variants. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:22:10 + Name: UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilXml-writeElement.patch +Description: Add more childElementList and firstChildElement variants. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/component/ComponentLoaderConfig.java + | 2 + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilXml.java + | 80 ++++++++++ + components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/widget/form/ModelFormField.java + | 4 + components/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/model/ModelViewEntity.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/SimpleMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CallClassMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CallObjectMethod.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/callops/CreateObject.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/conditional/CombinedCondition.java +| 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/conditional/MasterIf.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/otherops/Calculate.java + | 4 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/otherops/Log.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/operation/MakeInString.java + | 2 + components/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/operation/SimpleMapProcess.java + | 2 + 14 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:22:50 + Created an attachment (id=58) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:14 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 58 + 2004-04-29 16:22:50 + The patch. + 1 + UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/58/UtilXml-childElementList-firstChildElement.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:22:50 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=58) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:47 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:14 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:24:14 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 130 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429174623 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:24:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + put now returns the previous value of the object, if it exists + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:24:36 + Name: UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-listeners.patch +Description: put now returns the previous value of the object, if it exists +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 16 ++++++++++------ + 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:24:58 + Created an attachment (id=59) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:23 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 59 + 2004-04-29 16:24:58 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/59/UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:24:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=59) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:23 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:23 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 131 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040429174619 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 16:55:31 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add getCacheLineKeys method. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:55:31 + Name: UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-put-returns-object.patch +Description: Add getCacheLineKeys method. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 4 ++++ + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:55:56 + Created an attachment (id=60) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + Changing priority to P2, as I need these applied before I can commit my entity +cache work. + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:19 + Now in CVS, thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 60 + 2004-04-29 16:55:56 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/60/UtilCache-getCacheLineKeys.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:55:56 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=60) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 16:57:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:19 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-04-29 17:46:19 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 132 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501051751 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 19:39:13 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add entrySet(), which functions like Map.entrySet(). + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:39:13 + Name: UtilCache-entrySet.patch +Prune: 1 +Description: Add entrySet(), which functions like Map.entrySet(). +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 4 ++++ + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:41:28 + Created an attachment (id=61) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:53 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:17:51 + These are now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 61 + 2004-04-29 19:41:27 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-entrySet.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/61/UtilCache-entrySet.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:41:28 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=61) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:53 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:17:51 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 05:17:51 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 133 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501042628 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 19:42:19 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Add a new constructor. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:42:19 + Name: UtilCache-new-constructor.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-entrySet.patch +Description: Add a new constructor. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 13 +++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:42:45 + Created an attachment (id=62) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:48 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + doogie + 2004-04-30 10:42:15 + Changing these issuses, as they are needed by EntityCache.patch. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:28 + These are now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 62 + 2004-04-29 19:42:45 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-new-constructor.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/62/UtilCache-new-constructor.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:42:45 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=62) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:48 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + doogie + 2004-04-30 10:42:15 + priority + Priority + P2 + P1 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:28 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:28 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 134 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501062248 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 19:43:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Change utilCacheTable to a WeakHashMap. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:43:49 + Name: UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-new-constructor.patch +Description: Change utilCacheTable to a WeakHashMap. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 3 ++- + 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:44:39 + Created an attachment (id=63) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:48 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 63 + 2004-04-29 19:44:39 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/63/UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:44:39 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=63) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:48 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:22:48 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 135 + RESOLVED + P1 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501042633 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 19:45:22 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Methods that clear a cache by name or pattern. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:45:22 + Name: UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-WeakHashMap.patch +Description: Methods that clear a cache by name or pattern. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilCache.java | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:45:43 + Created an attachment (id=64) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + doogie + 2004-04-30 10:42:16 + Changing these issuses, as they are needed by EntityCache.patch. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:33 + These are now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 64 + 2004-04-29 19:45:43 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/64/UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:45:43 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=64) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:49 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + doogie + 2004-04-30 10:42:16 + priority + Priority + P2 + P1 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:33 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 04:26:33 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 136 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040501064335 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-04-29 19:46:54 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Place the loaded document object in a UtilCache instance. + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:46:54 + Name: ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch +Prune: 1 +Depends: UtilCache-clearCache-helpers.patch +Description: Place the loaded document object in a UtilCache instance. +DiffStat: + base/src/base/org/ofbiz/base/config/ResourceLoader.java | 11 ++++------- + 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:47:17 + Created an attachment (id=65) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:50 + Changing priority, so that someone else can see the ones I want applied next. + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:43:35 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 65 + 2004-04-29 19:47:17 + The patch. + 1 + ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/65/ResourceLoader-document-in-cache.patch + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:47:17 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=65) +The patch. + + + + doogie + 2004-04-29 19:57:50 + priority + Priority + P3 + P2 + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:43:35 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-01 06:43:35 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 137 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040527233355 + Accounting + sichen + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-05-03 14:48:41 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + createInvoiceForOrder not get correct fields for terms + + + 141 + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:21 + + + sichen + 2004-05-03 14:48:41 + InvoiceServices.createInvoiceForOrder is not getting correct fields for terms. +It is not automatically generating a key for InvoiceTerm entity and is also +looking for "termType" from BillingAccount when the field is actually "termTypeId." + + + sichen + 2004-05-03 14:50:09 + Created an attachment (id=66) +Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly + + + + jacopo + 2004-05-04 00:50:17 + See also issue #97 + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:20 + *** Issue 141 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:33:55 + It's now in CVS, thanks to both Si Chen and Jacopo Cappellato for reporting/fixing this. + + + text/plain + 66 + 2004-05-03 14:50:09 + Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly + 1 + InvoiceServices.java.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/66/InvoiceServices.java.patch + + + sichen + 2004-05-03 14:50:09 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=66) +Patch fixes defect and allows invoices to be created correctly + + + + jonesde + 2004-05-03 23:03:12 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:33:55 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-05-27 23:33:55 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 138 + RESOLVED + P3 + WORKSFORME + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040713022331 + Manufacturing + sichen + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-05-04 17:45:50 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Windows XP + Null delegator in FindProductRun + + + sichen + 2004-05-04 17:45:50 + I am getting a +4269781[ VisitHandler.java:130:ERROR] Could not find delegator with +delegatorName [null] in session, not creating Visit entity + +Is this a Windows problem or a bug? + +Thanks, + +Si Chen + + + sichen + 2004-05-04 17:46:33 + Created an attachment (id=67) +error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-13 02:23:31 + I couldn't recreate this error. +However, from the log it seems something related to the Visit stuff. + + + text/plain + 67 + 2004-05-04 17:46:33 + error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing + + findproductrun.log + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/67/findproductrun.log + + + sichen + 2004-05-04 17:46:33 + attachments.thedata + Attachment Data + + Created an attachment (id=67) +error log from running FindProductRun in Manufacturing + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-13 02:23:31 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-13 02:23:31 + resolution + Resolution + + WORKSFORME + + + + 139 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + david + 20040509064322 + E-Commerce + arukala + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-05-09 06:43:22 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Reading UiLable Properties in Email templates + + + arukala + 2004-05-09 06:43:22 + Hallo David, + +We are looking for your suggestions. on how should i call the UiLabel +Properties in eCommerce Email Templates. we are eager to see this feature in +email Confirmation after placing an order for customers?. suggest us how to? + + + + 140 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + jacopo + 20040518040000 + Manufacturing + jacopo + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-05-11 08:26:52 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Remove all the checks against the isVariant field. + + + jacopo + 2004-05-11 08:26:52 + Remove all the checks against the isVariant field: the best way to see if a +product is variant is to check the ProductAssoc entity. + + + jacopo + 2004-05-18 04:00:00 + Committed with the last changes a few days ago. + + + jacopo + 2004-05-18 04:00:00 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-05-18 04:00:00 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 141 + RESOLVED + P3 + DUPLICATE + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040526104821 + Accounting + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-05-26 09:01:42 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Patch for bug in invoice creation when terms are specified for a billing account. + + + 137 + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:21 + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 09:01:42 + Patch for bug in invoice creation when terms are specified for billing account: +A wrong field name was used. +Also a non-null field was not set. + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 09:02:49 + Created an attachment (id=68) +The patch file in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:21 + Ok, Si Chen had already fixed this!!! + +*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 137 *** + + + text/plain + 68 + 2004-05-26 09:02:49 + The patch file in UOF + 1 + InvoiceServices.java.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/68/InvoiceServices.java.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 09:02:49 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=68) +The patch file in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:21 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-05-26 10:48:21 + resolution + Resolution + + DUPLICATE + + + + 142 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + PC + ajzeneski + 20040630194530 + Party + jackhung + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-06-15 03:33:20 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Linux + Party Profile [New Communication] throws exception + + + jackhung + 2004-06-15 03:33:20 + Error: The application script threw an exception: Sourced file: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +: null : at Line: 47 : in file: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +: party .getRelatedOne ( "Person" ) Target exception: +java.lang.NullPointerException: Null Pointer in Method Invocation BSF info: +/mnt/hda6/jackwork/ofbiz3/workspace/ofbiz/components/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/communication/editCommunication.bsh +at line: 0 column: 0 + + +URL: https://jhpc:18443/partymgr/control/viewCommunicationEvent?partyIdFrom=ltdadmin + +partyId = request.getParameter("party_id"); +... +party = delegator.findByPrimaryKey("Party", UtilMisc.toMap("partyId", partyId)); +context.put("party", party); +context.put("lookupPerson", party.getRelatedOne("Person")); <--- + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:45:30 + This has been fixed in CVS + + + jonesde + 2004-06-15 03:39:27 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:45:30 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:45:30 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 143 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630194322 + Order + sichen + not determined + FEATURE + 2004-06-17 10:51:48 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate + + + sichen + 2004-06-17 10:51:48 + Changed ShoppingCart.java and CheckoutHelper.java to allow ship before and +after dates to be set using the OrderShipmentPreference entity. +OrderServices.java is modified as well to allow these dates to go on the order +confirmation email. + + + sichen + 2004-06-17 10:53:16 + Created an attachment (id=69) +Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java, + + + + text/plain + 69 + 2004-06-17 10:53:16 + Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java, + 1 + order_dating_patch.txt + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/69/order_dating_patch.txt + + + sichen + 2004-06-17 10:53:16 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=69) +Patches ShoppingCart.java, CheckoutHelper.java, OrderServices.java, + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:43:22 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:43:22 + short_desc + Summary + Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate + Allows orders to have shipBeforeDate and shipAfterDate + + + + 144 + RESOLVED + P3 + WORKSFORME + Base + CVS + PC + issues@ofbiz + 20040630194017 + Base + jackhung + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-06-18 02:57:10 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Linux + https connection broke Mozilla 1.3 and 1.4 + + + jackhung + 2004-06-18 02:57:10 + I'm getting a strange problem lately (2 days). I'm at the ecommerce's main page +and try to [Login] (url +https://www.myhost.net:8443/ecommerce/control/checkLogin/main). The +certification stuff comes up and I accepted it. On one of my system using +Mozilla 1.3, the browser popup a dialog saying: + "www.myhost.net has received an incorrect or unexpected message. Error Code: +-12229" +For all subsequent attempt, the browser popup a dialog saying: + "The Document contains no data" +It appears that the browser is not sending any request to the server on +subsequent attempt. + +On another system using Mozilla 1.4, i did not get the "unexpected message", but +still got the "no data" one. + +I have an Crozilla 1.3a browser around (from the Mozilla SVG project). I tried +it and it works!! + +As a matter of fact, i'm having the same problem with any of the secure +components (webtools, partymgr, ...) + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:40:17 + I cannot duplicate this issue with FireFox. It could be a bug in that version of mozilla. Is this still an +issue w/ the 1.5-1.7? + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:40:17 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:40:17 + resolution + Resolution + + WORKSFORME + + + + 145 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040619093839 + Party + sichen + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-18 09:57:41 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fixes duplicated PartyContactMechPurposes when using updatePartyContactMech + + + sichen + 2004-06-18 09:57:41 + Fixes duplicated PartyContactMechPurposes when using updatePartyContactMech to +move a party's contact information from an old contactMechId to a +newContactMechId by checking to make sure the PartyContactMechPurpose does not +already exist. + + + sichen + 2004-06-18 09:58:34 + Created an attachment (id=70) +Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-19 09:38:39 + It's in CVS now. Thanks Si. + + + text/plain + 70 + 2004-06-18 09:58:34 + Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml + 1 + PartyContactMechServices.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/70/PartyContactMechServices.patch + + + sichen + 2004-06-18 09:58:34 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=70) +Patches PartyContactMechServices.xml + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-19 09:38:39 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-06-19 09:38:39 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 146 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040622094557 + Party + sichen + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-21 17:56:29 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Passes partyId into updatePostalAddress from updatepartyPostalAddress + + + sichen + 2004-06-21 17:56:29 + Passes partyId into updatePostalAddress from updatePartyPostalAddress, to +preserve it for updateCreditCard later. + + + sichen + 2004-06-21 17:57:02 + Created an attachment (id=71) +Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-22 09:45:57 + It's in. Thanks Si Chen. + + + text/plain + 71 + 2004-06-21 17:57:02 + Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress + 1 + PartyContactMechServices.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/71/PartyContactMechServices.patch + + + sichen + 2004-06-21 17:57:02 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=71) +Passes partyId from updatePartyPostalAddress to updatePostalAddress + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-22 09:45:57 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-06-22 09:45:57 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 147 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040623161518 + Product + sichen + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-06-22 15:58:48 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Minor additions to calculateProductPrice + + + sichen + 2004-06-22 15:58:48 + Implements a "Percent of Default Price" price action for price rules and checks +both default and list prices when there is a "Promotional Price Override" price +action. + + + sichen + 2004-06-22 15:59:22 + Created an attachment (id=72) +minor additions to calculateProductPrice + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-23 16:15:18 + Okay, this patch is in. Thanks for working on this and sending it over Si. + + + text/plain + 72 + 2004-06-22 15:59:22 + minor additions to calculateProductPrice + 1 + calculateProductPrice.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/72/calculateProductPrice.patch + + + sichen + 2004-06-22 15:59:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=72) +minor additions to calculateProductPrice + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-23 16:15:18 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-06-23 16:15:18 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 148 + RESOLVED + P2 + WORKSFORME + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040730233418 + Accounting + jacopo + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-06-23 05:42:27 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Duplicate invoices for the same order under some cicumstances. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-23 05:42:27 + With "Offline Payments", from the order detail page it is possible to +receive payments: when the payments cover the order's grand total an invoice +is generated; also when the shipment to which the order is issued changes +its status to PACKED an invoice is created: this can cause the creation +of two different invoices for the same order. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 21:11:52 + I cannot duplicate this problem; I attempted an offline order, received the payment - no invoice was +created; issued a quick ship a single invoice was created. Please provide more details. + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 23:34:18 + I cannot believe... I have tried again and the problem is gone away. +However I'm totally sure (99%) that this was an issue... + + + + jonesde + 2004-06-23 16:16:30 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 23:34:18 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 23:34:18 + resolution + Resolution + + WORKSFORME + + + + 149 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040818085225 + Order + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-26 01:51:16 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Patch for bug that happens when you try to cancel an order item. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:51:16 + In revision 1.30 of the services.xml file for the order component, the require- +new-transaction="true" was added to the resetGrandTotal service: this causes +problems when you cancel an order item because the resetGrandTotal is one of +the services that are triggered and it seems to hang up the process waiting for +a transaction (at least this happens with SAP-DB). + +The attached patch removes the require-new-transaction="true" parameter and +this solves the problem; however I don't know if this could cause other +problems in different parts of the system. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:51:58 + Created an attachment (id=73) +Patch in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-08-18 08:52:25 + The patch has been applied. + + + text/plain + 73 + 2004-06-26 01:51:58 + Patch in UOF + 1 + services.xml.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/73/services.xml.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:51:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=73) +Patch in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-08-18 08:52:25 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-08-18 08:52:25 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 150 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630190556 + Order + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-26 01:56:29 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + When you receive a purchase order the order lines are declared completed (also multiple times) even if it's not true. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:56:29 + The attached patch fixes two bugs that caused the problem. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:56:53 + Created an attachment (id=74) +Tha patch in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:05:56 + patch applied to CVS + + + text/plain + 74 + 2004-06-26 01:56:53 + Tha patch in UOF + 1 + OrderSimpleMethods.xml.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/74/OrderSimpleMethods.xml.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 01:56:53 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=74) +Tha patch in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:05:56 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:05:56 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 151 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630224402 + Order + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-26 02:01:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In order entry, if no party is selected, during the checkout process some errors are generated: this patch fix the problem by disabling the checkout link if the party is missing. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:01:14 + In order entry, if no party is selected, during the checkout process some +errors are generated: this patch fix the problem by disabling the checkout link +if the party is missing. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:01:41 + Created an attachment (id=75) +Patch in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:19:39 + I cannot duplicate this issue; is it still a problem? + + + jacopo + 2004-06-30 22:44:02 + Hmmm, now it seems to work for me, too. +I'm wondering if something is changed during the last 10 days... I was quite +sure about this problem. +By the way, I'm going to declare resolved this issue, thanks. + + + + text/plain + 75 + 2004-06-26 02:01:41 + Patch in UOF + 1 + noparty.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/75/noparty.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:01:41 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=75) +Patch in UOF + + + + jacopo + 2004-06-30 22:44:02 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-06-30 22:44:02 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 152 + RESOLVED + P4 + LATER + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040630192805 + Order + jacopo + not determined + PATCH + 2004-06-26 02:13:57 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Shipping location is missing in purchase orders: this causes problems when you try to cancel an order item. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:13:57 + In purchase order the shipping location address is not set and this causes +problems when you try to cancel order items (the shipping location is used is +some service that are triggered in this situation, such as the calcTax service +etc...). +In my opinion the best solution is to add a shipping location address to the +purchase order. +The address could be that of the facility that will receive the po. + +I have also attached a patch (not a good one, so probably you shouldn't apply +it) that fix this problem by allowing, during order entry, to select one of the +addresses of the facility that is linked to the productStore for which the +purchase order is taken: so in the checkinits page the store selection should +be enabled for purchase orders too. + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:14:21 + Created an attachment (id=76) +Patch in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:28:05 + Sounds like there are more issues here. First off most likely tax should not be calculated for purchase +orders; nor should the same shipping charges which apply to sales orders should not apply to purchase +orders. + +I will see what I can do when working on some additional PO enhancements. + + + text/plain + 76 + 2004-06-26 02:14:20 + Patch in UOF + 1 + shipping_address.patch + 194 + jacopo + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/76/shipping_address.patch + + + jacopo + 2004-06-26 02:14:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=76) +Patch in UOF + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:28:05 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-06-30 19:28:05 + resolution + Resolution + + LATER + + + + 153 + NEW + P5 + + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040707011403 + Service + eckardjf + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-05 12:19:00 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + purgeOldJobs service leaves artifacts + + + eckardjf + 2004-07-05 12:19:00 + The purgeOldJobs service will remove qualifying JobSandbox entities, but will not remove the related +RuntimeData, RecurrenceInfo and RecurrenceRule entities (even if they are not referenced by an +existing WorkEffort). + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:14:03 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + + 154 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707150844 + Content + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-06 12:49:26 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Unknown import + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 12:49:26 + Region.java imports com.sun.rsasign.r. When compiling with jikes, this class is +not available. Removing the import, and the class compiles fine, so it's +obviously not needed. + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 12:49:58 + Created an attachment (id=77) +Remove the bad import + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 15:08:44 + This import has now been removed, not even sure why it was there in the first place... Thanks Adam. + + + text/plain + 77 + 2004-07-06 12:49:58 + Remove the bad import + 1 + Region.java.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/77/Region.java.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 12:49:58 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=77) +Remove the bad import + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 15:08:44 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 15:08:44 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 155 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707011249 + Base + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-06 14:27:26 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + UtilCache does not allow for null keys + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:27:26 + UtilCache doesn't allow null keys to be stored. This is sub-optimal, and +actually causes problems with my enhanced entity cache code. Attached patch fixes. + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:28:17 + Created an attachment (id=78) +Allow for null keys + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:49 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 78 + 2004-07-06 14:28:17 + Allow for null keys + 1 + UtilCache-null-key.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/78/UtilCache-null-key.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:28:17 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=78) +Allow for null keys + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:49 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:49 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 156 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707011312 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-07-06 14:30:09 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow specifying the expire time on put in UtilCache + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:30:09 + Add a new put method, that takes an expireTime parameter. + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:30:31 + Created an attachment (id=79) +The patch. + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:13:12 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 79 + 2004-07-06 14:30:31 + The patch. + 1 + UtilCache-put-takes-expireTime.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/79/UtilCache-put-takes-expireTime.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:30:31 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=79) +The patch. + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:13:12 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:13:12 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 157 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Base + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707011225 + Base + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-07-06 14:35:33 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + In UtilCache, allow for a list of property bases to be specified + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:35:33 + When a UtilCache instance is created, it currently will only look for a single +matching property value, by name. This patch allows for a list of base property +names to be specified, and the first one found will be used. + +I make use of this in my entity cache code. For instance: +== +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.${entity-name}.expireTime=1800000 +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.${entity-name}.maxSize=500 + +# high count, low access +# 5 minute cache time +Cache.entity-list.${delegator-name}.PartyAttribute=300000 +== + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:35:48 + Created an attachment (id=80) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:25 + This is now in CVS, thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 80 + 2004-07-06 14:35:48 + The patch + 1 + UtilCache-wildcard-config.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/80/UtilCache-wildcard-config.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-06 14:35:48 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=80) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:25 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:12:25 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 158 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707011838 + Product + sichen + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-06 17:08:44 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + distinct attribute for getProductFeatures is not working + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:08:44 + distinct attribute for getProductFeatures service does not work because it is +trying to use ProductFeatureType rather than ProductFeatureTypeId in +ProductServices.prodGetFeatures + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:16:51 + Created an attachment (id=81) +Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:18:38 + It's in CVS now, thanks Si! + + + text/plain + 81 + 2004-07-06 17:16:51 + Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId + 1 + ProductServices_1.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/81/ProductServices_1.patch + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:16:51 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=81) +Corrects productFeatureType to productFeatureTypeId + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:18:38 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:18:38 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 159 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707012137 + Product + sichen + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-07-06 17:26:05 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Adds productFeatureApplTypeId field to getProductFeatureSet service + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:26:05 + Adds productFeatureApplTypeId as optional field to getProductFeatureSet service. + If none is specified, it will still search for "SELECTABLE_FEATURE"s (to be +compatible with existing code), but if one is specified, it will use that +productFeatureApplTypeId, so the same service can now be used to search for +STANDARD, DISTINGUISHING, OPTIONAL features. + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:27:49 + Created an attachment (id=82) +Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:21:37 + It's in CVS now, thanks Si! + + + text/plain + 82 + 2004-07-06 17:27:49 + Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field + 1 + ProductServices_2.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/82/ProductServices_2.patch + + + sichen + 2004-07-06 17:27:49 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=82) +Extends getProductFeatures with optional productFeatureApplTypeId field + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:21:37 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 01:21:37 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 160 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040707144701 + Entity Extensions + doogie + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-07-07 07:27:45 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + implement condition versions of functions in entityext + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 07:27:45 + I had sent an earlier version of this patch to the mailing list. I'm now adding +it as an issue, as I have for all the other patches. + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 07:28:22 + Created an attachment (id=83) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 14:47:01 + This is now in CVS. Thanks Adam! + + + text/plain + 83 + 2004-07-07 07:28:22 + The patch + 1 + cache-entityext.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/83/cache-entityext.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-07 07:28:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=83) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 14:47:01 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-07 14:47:01 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 161 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040708153407 + WebTools + doogie + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-08 11:51:01 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + NPE in FindUtilCacheElements.jsp + + + doogie + 2004-07-08 11:51:01 + Missed one NPE when key is null(calls key.toString()). + + + doogie + 2004-07-08 11:51:22 + Created an attachment (id=84) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-08 15:34:07 + Thanks Adam, it is now in CVS. + + + text/plain + 84 + 2004-07-08 11:51:22 + The patch + 1 + FindUtilCacheElements.jsp.patch + 270 + doogie + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/84/FindUtilCacheElements.jsp.patch + + + doogie + 2004-07-08 11:51:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=84) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-08 15:34:07 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-08 15:34:07 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 162 + RESOLVED + P3 + WORKSFORME + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040713170819 + Workflow + ktippetts + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-12 09:32:42 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Linux + NoSuchMethodError in Entity Data Maintenance + + + ktippetts + 2004-07-12 09:32:42 + Getting this error when trying to view entity data in Webtools | Entity Data +Maintenance: + +<snip> +Exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError +Message: +org.ofbiz.entity.condition.EntityFieldMap.<init>(Ljava/util/Map;Lorg/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityOperator;)V +----- stack trace ---------------------------------------- +java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: +org.ofbiz.entity.condition.EntityFieldMap.<init>(Ljava/util/Map;Lorg/ofbiz/entity/condition/EntityOperator;)V +org.apache.jsp.entity.FindGeneric_jsp._jspService(FindGeneric_jsp.java:159) +<snip> + +To duplicate Using CVS code as of 09Jul2004: +* Webtools > Entity Data Maintenance +* Click 'All' on any entity. + +Possible Solution: +* in FindGeneric.jsp (line 94) change 2nd parameter to EntityJoinOperator.AND + + + jonesde + 2004-07-12 20:41:10 + This works fine from a clean compile, but if have partial old code and partial new code in a build it may +have problems. Try an "ant clean" and then an "ant". + + + doogie + 2004-07-13 17:08:19 + The signature of the constructor changed. It used to take an EntityOperator. +However, the code only accepted an EntityJoinOperator. Passing in an +EntityComparisonOperator would have caused it to fail. + +Also, running ant clean will *not* fix the problem. The parsed/compiled jsp +pages need to be cleaned out. + + + jonesde + 2004-07-12 20:41:10 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-07-12 20:41:10 + resolution + Resolution + + WORKSFORME + + + + 163 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Documentation + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730150851 + website + michaelrempel + not determined + TASK + 2004-07-13 11:11:43 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + cant get csv instructions + + + michaelrempel + 2004-07-13 11:11:43 + When I pull up csv instructions for either the wincsv or command line, I get a +logon request screen, even though I am logged on. + +Thx + +Michael Rempel + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:08:51 + This is a java.net related issue not OFBiz; please contact the Java.Net team for help. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:08:51 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 15:08:51 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 164 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730204811 + Security + adrianc + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-14 12:24:23 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + SecurityData.xml File + + + adrianc + 2004-07-14 12:24:23 + From mailing list: + +On Jul 14, 2004, at 12:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: + +> I was just wondering... +> +> Why is the security data for ALL components in the SecurityData.xml file? This +file looks monolithic. Shouldn't each component load its own security data? +> +> -Adrian + + +Adrian, + +Yes, good point, monolithic is a good word for this. Ideally it should be split +up, I think that's a good idea. + +If anyone wants to work on this please do... In the mean time it might be a good +idea to create an issue for it. + +-David + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:48:11 + applied patch file(s); now in CVS + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:48:11 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 20:48:11 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 165 + RESOLVED + P4 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + ajzeneski + 20040730065021 + Order + pgoron + not determined + PATCH + 2004-07-15 06:34:37 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow user to specify default value for desired delivery date and comment fields in order entry GUI + + + pgoron + 2004-07-15 06:34:37 + This patch allows user to define default desired delivery date and default +comment during quickaddform filling in OrderEntry page. Thus, users are not +obliged any more to reinput these informations for each order item. + + + pgoron + 2004-07-15 06:35:35 + Created an attachment (id=85) +The patch + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 06:50:21 + The patch is in CVS. + + + text/plain + 85 + 2004-07-15 06:35:35 + The patch + 1 + order20040707.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/85/order20040707.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-07-15 06:35:35 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=85) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-07-15 16:16:54 + assigned_to + Assigned To + issues@ofbiz + ajzeneski + + + jonesde + 2004-07-15 16:16:54 + issue_type + Issue Type + ENHANCEMENT + PATCH + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 06:50:21 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 06:50:21 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 166 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730115233 + Order + pgoron + not determined + PATCH + 2004-07-21 02:46:56 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Allow user to associate parties to an order in OrderEntry website + + + pgoron + 2004-07-21 02:46:56 + Hi, + +Currently, I did not found any way to associate additional parties to an order. +That's why I've written this enhancement patch. + + +This patch adds a new step during order entry in which user can associate +additional party&role to order. Then, these informations are stored in OrderRole +entity. + + +List of modifications : +- I've written a new view in which user can select a party and party's role to +associate to order ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/SetAdditionalParty.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/SetAdditionalParty.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/entry/SetAdditionalParty.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/AdditionalPartyListing.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/AdditionalPartyListing.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/entry/PartySettingsForm.xml +M webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/controller.xml + +- I've included list of additional parties associated to order in confimorder view +M webapp/ordermgr/entry/confirmorder.ftl +M webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/entry/confirmorder.xml + +- I've modified these files so that my view is shown before order confirmation +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/CheckOutEvents.java +M webapp/ordermgr/entry/showcart.ftl + +- I've modified storeOrder service and ShoppingCart to take in account +additional parties. +M servicedef/services.xml +M src/org/ofbiz/order/order/OrderServices.java +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ShoppingCartEvents.java +M src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ShoppingCart.java + +- I've copied some files from content module to be able to use GenericLookup. ++ src/org/ofbiz/order/lookupParams.java ++ webapp/ordermgr/lookup/FieldLookupForms.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/lookup/GenericLookup.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/templates/lookup.ftl ++ webapp/ordermgr/templates/lookup.xml ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/findprepLk.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/formprep.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/includes/pagelistprepLk.bsh ++ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/pagedefs/lookup/GenericLookup.xml + + + pgoron + 2004-07-21 02:47:42 + Created an attachment (id=86) +The patch + + + + pgoron + 2004-07-22 00:38:39 + I've found some minor mistakes. I am correcting them and I will send a new patch +as soon as possible. + + + pgoron + 2004-07-22 01:29:07 + Created an attachment (id=87) +The corrected patch + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 11:52:33 + The patches are in CVS. + + + text/plain + 86 + 2004-07-21 02:47:42 + The patch + 1 + order20040721.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/86/order20040721.patch + + + text/plain + 87 + 2004-07-22 01:29:07 + The corrected patch + 1 + order20040722.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/87/order20040722.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-07-21 02:47:42 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=86) +The patch + + + + pgoron + 2004-07-22 01:29:07 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=87) +The corrected patch + + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 11:52:33 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jacopo + 2004-07-30 11:52:33 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 167 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730145814 + Accounting + sichen + not determined + PATCH + 2004-07-28 17:15:09 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Fixes a couple of other getNextSeqId methods + + + sichen + 2004-07-28 17:15:09 + getNextSeqId now returns a string(), so .toString() is no longer needed and will +cause runtime exceptions. + + + sichen + 2004-07-28 17:19:29 + Created an attachment (id=88) +Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:58:14 + patch applied + + + text/plain + 88 + 2004-07-28 17:19:29 + Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine + 1 + changes.txt + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/88/changes.txt + + + sichen + 2004-07-28 17:19:29 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=88) +Changes getNextSeqId usage to PaymentGatewayServices and GenericAsyncEngine + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:58:14 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:58:14 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 168 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040730144804 + Content + pgoron + not determined + PATCH + 2004-07-29 02:43:55 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + FreeMarker localization issues + + + pgoron + 2004-07-29 02:43:55 + Hi, + +This patch resolves some localization issues. Currently, FreeMarker formats +number according to the machine's locale. My patch forces FreeMarker to use the +user session's locale. + +It must be applied in ofbiz/components/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/webapp/ftl +folder. + + + pgoron + 2004-07-29 02:45:19 + Created an attachment (id=89) +The patch + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:48:04 + This has been fixed in CVS + + + text/plain + 89 + 2004-07-29 02:45:19 + The patch + 1 + locale-freemaker-200040727.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/89/locale-freemaker-200040727.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-07-29 02:45:19 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=89) +The patch + + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:48:04 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 14:48:04 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 169 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + PC + issues@ofbiz + 20040730220642 + E-Commerce + amheiss + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-07-30 09:53:11 + issues@ofbiz + + https://localhost:8443/ecommerce/control/finalizeOrder + + Linux + Party/Userlogin issues + + + amheiss + 2004-07-30 09:53:11 + Application will not allow run of createPartyPostalAddress (due to null user +login?). Sequence of events from july 30th, 11am build: goto ecommerce, +login, then logout. attempt to use anonymous checkout after this, and shipping +address feilds prepopulated with previous logins settings. After adjusting and +trying to save, get error 'User authorization is required for this service: +createPartyPostalAddress ' . + +Debug output from shipsettings.bsh: +Debug.log("party ID : " + partyId); ---> output admin ( i logged in as admin, +then logged out) +Debug.log("ul: " + session.getAttribute("userLogin")); ---> (null) + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 22:06:42 + Yes, if there is an autoUserLogin attribute available that will break anonymous checkout. In theory, the +anonymous checkout links should not be displayed if there is an auto-userlogin. However, I have added +some code to clear this when entering the anonymous checkout process. + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 22:06:42 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-07-30 22:06:42 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 170 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040804093020 + Product + sichen + not determined + ENHANCEMENT + 2004-08-03 17:02:41 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Optionally duplicates ProductContent when duplicating a Product + + + sichen + 2004-08-03 17:02:41 + Will now optionally duplicate ProductContent entries when duplicating a Product + + + sichen + 2004-08-03 17:03:19 + Created an attachment (id=90) +Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:30:20 + Thanks Si. This is now in CVS. I also did a content remove option, and fixed an issue I noticed with the +product IDs (GoodIdentification). BTW, this is from a slightly earlier version of OFBiz than the current +CVS as this form has been moved to the file EditProductDupForm.ftl. + + + text/plain + 90 + 2004-08-03 17:03:19 + Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml + 1 + duplicateProduct.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/90/duplicateProduct.patch + + + sichen + 2004-08-03 17:03:19 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=90) +Patches services.xml, EditProduct.ftl, and ProductServices.xml + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:30:20 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:30:20 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 171 + RESOLVED + P2 + FIXED + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040804091929 + Product + pgoron + not determined + PATCH + 2004-08-04 00:59:53 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Comparaison bug in InventoryServices.xml minilang script + + + pgoron + 2004-08-04 00:59:53 + Some if-compare element forget to declare type used to compare fields. By +default, string comparison is used whereas Double is required. + + +Applying patch : +cd /ofbiz/components/product/script/org/ofbiz/product/inventory +patch -p0 < InventoryServices.xml.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-08-04 01:01:13 + Created an attachment (id=91) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:19:29 + Thanks, it's now in CVS. + + + text/plain + 91 + 2004-08-04 01:01:13 + The patch + 1 + InventoryServices.xml.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/91/InventoryServices.xml.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-08-04 01:01:13 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=91) +The patch + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:19:29 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-04 09:19:29 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 172 + NEW + P2 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040819033400 + Order + pgoron + not determined + PATCH + 2004-08-05 07:09:49 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Bug in shippableWeight calculation from OrderReadHelper.getShippableWeight method + + + pgoron + 2004-08-05 07:09:49 + Hi, + +The purpose of this patch is to solve a bug in +OrderReadHelper.getShippableWeight method. The algorithm of shippable weight +calculation don't care of order item's quantity. So there is an inconsistency +with ShoppingCart.getShippableWeight method when order is modified after his +creation (for example, by RecalcShippingTotal service). + +Applying patch: +cd ofbiz/components/order/src/org/ofbiz/order/order +patch -p0 < OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch + +Peter Goron + + + pgoron + 2004-08-05 07:10:36 + Created an attachment (id=92) +The patch + + + + pgoron + 2004-08-19 03:34:00 + Created an attachment (id=96) +An up to date patch + + + + text/plain + 92 + 2004-08-05 07:10:36 + The patch + 1 + OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/92/OrderReadHelper-20040805.patch + + + text/plain + 96 + 2004-08-19 03:34:00 + An up to date patch + 1 + OrderReadHelper-200408019.patch + 392 + pgoron + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/96/OrderReadHelper-200408019.patch + + + pgoron + 2004-08-05 07:10:36 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=92) +The patch + + + + pgoron + 2004-08-19 03:34:00 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=96) +An up to date patch + + + + + 173 + RESOLVED + P3 + INVALID + Base + CVS + PC + issues@ofbiz + 20040809165336 + Startup + mn + not determined + PATCH + 2004-08-09 13:38:08 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Linux + typo in base/config/debug.properties + + + mn + 2004-08-09 13:38:08 + Index: base/config/debug.properties +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/ofbiz/base/config/debug.properties,v +retrieving revision 1.10 +diff -u -r1.10 debug.properties +--- base/config/debug.properties 9 Jun 2004 18:12:59 -0000 1.10 ++++ base/config/debug.properties 9 Aug 2004 19:32:33 -0000 +@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ + pack.exception=true + + # These top level switches are used before calling Log4J, or if Log4J is not used +-print.verbose=ftrue ++print.verbose=true + print.timing=true + print.info=true + print.important=true + + + mn + 2004-08-09 13:40:09 + Created an attachment (id=93) +corerct typo for print.verbose property + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-09 16:25:29 + In this case "ftrue" is not a misspelling of "true", we add the "f" before "true" so that it is easier to switch +between true and false than it would be to type out "true" and "false". In other words, anything but +"true" is false. + + + mn + 2004-08-09 16:53:36 + What about placing comment into debug.properties about this decision? + + + text/plain + 93 + 2004-08-09 13:40:09 + corerct typo for print.verbose property + 1 + debug.properties.patch + 377 + mn + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/93/debug.properties.patch + + + mn + 2004-08-09 13:40:09 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=93) +corerct typo for print.verbose property + + + + jonesde + 2004-08-09 16:25:29 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + jonesde + 2004-08-09 16:25:29 + resolution + Resolution + + INVALID + + + + 174 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040810161004 + Accounting + amheiss + not determined + PATCH + 2004-08-10 16:08:36 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + retry failed auths fix + + + amheiss + 2004-08-10 16:08:36 + retryFailedAuths service was creating superfluous retryFailedOrderAuth +services. I'll see if i can attach the patch to check on order status before +dispatching retryFailedOrderAuth service. If not, patch will be to dev list +soon enough. + + + amheiss + 2004-08-10 16:10:04 + Created an attachment (id=94) +Patch for retryFailedAuth fix + + + + text/plain + 94 + 2004-08-10 16:10:04 + Patch for retryFailedAuth fix + 1 + retryAuth.patch + 336 + amheiss + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/94/retryAuth.patch + + + amheiss + 2004-08-10 16:10:04 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=94) +Patch for retryFailedAuth fix + + + + + 175 + RESOLVED + P3 + FIXED + foo + unspecified + All + ajzeneski + 20040817213241 + bar + ajzeneski + milestone 1 + DEFECT + 2004-08-17 21:31:38 + ajzeneski + + + + All + bar + + + ajzeneski + 2004-08-17 21:31:38 + foo + + + ajzeneski + 2004-08-17 21:32:41 + . + + + ajzeneski + 2004-08-17 21:32:41 + issue_status + Status + NEW + RESOLVED + + + ajzeneski + 2004-08-17 21:32:41 + resolution + Resolution + + FIXED + + + + 176 + NEW + P3 + + Components + CVS + All + issues@ofbiz + 20040818174622 + Content + sichen + not determined + DEFECT + 2004-08-18 17:45:44 + issues@ofbiz + + + + All + Possible bug in renderContentAsText + + + sichen + 2004-08-18 17:45:44 + It seems that renderContentAsText is still trying to do a findByAnd on +SubContentDataResourceView with a fromDate as the orderBy, whereas +renderContentAsTextCache no longer does (it passes a null.) We got an +exception from this in ProductContentWrapper and made this change to fix it. +Is this a defect? + + + sichen + 2004-08-18 17:46:22 + Created an attachment (id=95) +Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView + + + + text/plain + 95 + 2004-08-18 17:46:22 + Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView + 1 + ContentWorker.patch + 178 + sichen + + https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/95/ContentWorker.patch + + + sichen + 2004-08-18 17:46:22 + attachments.ispatch + Attachment is Patch + + Created an attachment (id=95) +Changes findByAnd of SubContentDataResourceView + + + + + 177 + NEW + P3 + + Base + CVS + Other + issues@ofbiz + 20040910075014 + Base + lrawley + not determined + TASK + 2004-09-10 07:50:14 + issues@ofbiz + + + + Windows XP + HTTP Header needs Expires + + + lrawley + 2004-09-10 07:50:14 + Using Internet Explorer 6.0 with settings for automatically obtaining newer +versions of page. + +Images are cached and if changed are not refreshed on visits to the same page. +Pages get cached with login page because the first time a user requested they +were prompted to login first and then redirected to the page. + +This behavior is resolved if set to obtain newer versions on every visit, +however, this causes performance issues. So, automatically is the desired +browser setting. + +I would like to be able to set the EXPIRE in the HTTP header. I'm not sure +where this change needs to occur. Can you assist? Is this available in 3.0? +I am using 2.1.1. + +Please contact me at lrawley@tla.com. + +Lisa Rawley + + + -- cgit v1.2.3